[5.3] Allow SPI access within the same module in checkAccess #31660
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rdar://problem/61043406 rdar://problem/61987739
|
@swift-ci please test |
DougGregor
approved these changes
May 12, 2020
|
@swift-ci please nominate |
AnthonyLatsis
added
swift 5.3
🍒 release cherry pick
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of #31591.
SPI decls were not considered to be accessible from the same module when searched with
checkAccess. This affected the search for protocol conformances leading the compiler to complain wrongly about conformances or to synthesize==for an SPI type when there was already an implementation. The later caused an assert in SILGen.@_spiattribute.