Skip to content

[Concurrency] Stub out an experimental concurrency support library. #33196

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 30, 2020

Conversation

DougGregor
Copy link
Member

The experimental concurrency model will require a supporting runtime
and possibly end-user-visible library constructs. Introduce a stub of
such a library, enabled by a new build-script option
--enable-experimental-concurrency, so we have a place to put this
work.

The experimental concurrency model will require a supporting runtime
and possibly end-user-visible library constructs. Introduce a stub of
such a library, enabled by a new `build-script` option
`--enable-experimental-concurrency`, so we have a place to put this
work.
@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - 9b0266c

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test OS X Platform
Git Sha - 9b0266c

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci smoke test

1 similar comment
@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci smoke test

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test Windows

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci smoke test macOS

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

@DougGregor DougGregor merged commit e2cdc5e into swiftlang:master Jul 30, 2020
@DougGregor DougGregor deleted the concurrency-lib branch July 30, 2020 18:51
@gribozavr
Copy link
Contributor

@DougGregor I'm very interested in this work -- is there a proposal draft for it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants