Skip to content

[build] invoke swift-serialize-diagnostics for host architecture #33402

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

edymtt
Copy link
Contributor

@edymtt edymtt commented Aug 11, 2020

As a result of #33346 we are relying on the tool for the current architecture -- this will
work for the host architecture but will fail when crosscompiling.

Addresses rdar://66800239

As a result of swiftlang#33346 we are relying on the tool for the current target -- this will
work for the host architecture but will fail when crosscompiling.

Addresses rdar://66800239
@edymtt
Copy link
Contributor Author

edymtt commented Aug 11, 2020

@swift-ci please smoke test

Copy link
Member

@shahmishal shahmishal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@shahmishal
Copy link
Member

00:15:04.027 /bin/sh: /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/swift-PR-osx-smoke-test/branch-master/buildbot_incremental/swift-macosx-x86_64/./bin/swift-serialize-diagnostics: No such file or directory

@edymtt
Copy link
Contributor Author

edymtt commented Aug 11, 2020

@swift-ci please smoke test

@edymtt
Copy link
Contributor Author

edymtt commented Aug 11, 2020

@swift-ci please test Windows platform

@edymtt
Copy link
Contributor Author

edymtt commented Aug 11, 2020

@swift-ci please clean test Windows platform

Copy link
Contributor

@xedin xedin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants