[ownership] Add a few test cases that show that the reborrow verifier handles recursive reborrows correctly. #34583
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… handles recursive reborrows correctly. I also removed this tests dependency on the Swift module which speeds up running with a debug compiler. I am finishing up a generic RAUW value1 with value2 regardless of ownership. I want to depend on this behavior, so I wanted to put a test into tree to make sure it works/keeps on working.
|
@swift-ci smoke test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I also removed this tests dependency on the Swift module which speeds up running
with a debug compiler.
I am finishing up a generic RAUW value1 with value2 regardless of ownership. I
want to depend on this behavior, so I wanted to put a test into tree to make
sure it works/keeps on working.