-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
[ownership] Eliminate OperandOwnershipKindMap in favor of OwnershipConstraint #34683
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
gottesmm
merged 1 commit into
swiftlang:main
from
gottesmm:pr-d6205adb8f293c5e7c3fad8419163cc936cc4adc
Nov 11, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a lot of difficulty parsing names like this and attempting to sort out their meaning. It accepts any value? Obviously not. "Constraint" is already in the type name, so why is it repeated?
Whereas if it were simply
any()
or evenunconstrained()
I would immediately know what that means.I would also know what "acceptsAnyOwnership" means, so that would be ok. It's still unnecessarily verbose because constraints always imply acceptance and Ownership is already in the name.
Starting from a minimal recognizable name, before adding any more words, the question should be "how could any reasonable person be misled by the shorter name, and how would adding more words fix that problem without creating more confusion"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that any works well.