Skip to content

[sil.rst] Fix another formatting error #35258

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2021
Merged

[sil.rst] Fix another formatting error #35258

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions docs/SIL.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2334,11 +2334,11 @@ their lifetimes ended along paths that end in program terminating
blocks. Operationally, this implies that:

* All SIL values must have exactly one lifetime ending use on all paths that
terminate in a `return`_ or `throw`_. In contrast, a SIL value does not need to
have a lifetime ending use along paths that end in an `unreachable`_.
terminate in a `return`_ or `throw`_. In contrast, a SIL value does not need to
have a lifetime ending use along paths that end in an `unreachable`_.

* `end_borrow`_ and `destroy_value`_ are redundent, albeit legal, in blocks
where all paths through the block end in an `unreachable`_.
where all paths through the block end in an `unreachable`_.

Consider the following legal SIL where we leak ``%0`` in blocks prefixed with
``bbDeadEndBlock`` and consume it in ``bb2``::
Expand Down