Skip to content

[simplify-cfg] When moving cond_fail to preds, do not bail early. #3569

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2016

Conversation

gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor

What's in this pull request?

Resolved bug number: (SR-)


Before merging this pull request to apple/swift repository:

  • Test pull request on Swift continuous integration.

Triggering Swift CI

The swift-ci is triggered by writing a comment on this PR addressed to the GitHub user @swift-ci. Different tests will run depending on the specific comment that you use. The currently available comments are:

Smoke Testing

Platform Comment
All supported platforms @swift-ci Please smoke test
All supported platforms @swift-ci Please smoke test and merge
OS X platform @swift-ci Please smoke test OS X platform
Linux platform @swift-ci Please smoke test Linux platform

Validation Testing

Platform Comment
All supported platforms @swift-ci Please test
All supported platforms @swift-ci Please test and merge
OS X platform @swift-ci Please test OS X platform
OS X platform @swift-ci Please benchmark
Linux platform @swift-ci Please test Linux platform

Lint Testing

Language Comment
Python @swift-ci Please Python lint

Note: Only members of the Apple organization can trigger swift-ci.

This commit fixes a bug where we were not checking that all predecessors had the
cond_fail block as its only successor. This occured since we were bailing early
when we saw a constant. So if we saw a predecessor with a constant before a
predecessor that had multiple successors, we would optimize even though we would
be introducing an extra cond_fail along a path.

I added a new utility pass to test this code since so much is going on in
SimplifyCFG that it is difficult to construct a test case running the full
pass.

Really this code should be in a different pass (properly SIL Code Motion TBH).
But for now, this commit just fixes the bug.

rdar://26904047

@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test and merge

This commit fixes a bug where we were not checking that all predecessors had the
cond_fail block as its only successor. This occured since we were bailing early
when we saw a constant. So if we saw a predecessor with a constant before a
predecessor that had multiple successors, we would optimize even though we would
be introducing an extra cond_fail along a path.

I added a new utility pass to test this code since so much is going on in
SimplifyCFG that it is difficult to construct a test case running the full
pass.

Really this code should be in a different pass (properly SIL Code Motion TBH).
But for now, this commit just fixes the bug.

rdar://26904047
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test and merge

@swift-ci swift-ci merged commit 6662dd5 into swiftlang:master Jul 18, 2016
@gottesmm gottesmm deleted the rdar26904047 branch July 18, 2016 07:40
kateinoigakukun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants