Skip to content

Fixed some common grammatical errors in the comments. #38248

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 5, 2021
Merged

Fixed some common grammatical errors in the comments. #38248

merged 10 commits into from
Jul 5, 2021

Conversation

OneUpWallStreet
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed some common grammatical mistakes found in the comments of some files.

Copy link
Contributor

@xedin xedin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly looks good, thank you! I left some comments inline.

@OneUpWallStreet OneUpWallStreet requested a review from xedin July 3, 2021 16:16
Copy link
Contributor

@xedin xedin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks much better now, thank you! There is only a couple of newline changes I don’t think are necessary.

@@ -579,7 +580,6 @@ static bool tryDominatorBasedSimplifications(
}
return Changed;
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please this newline back?

@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ class SimplifyCFG {
bool ShouldVerify;
bool EnableJumpThread;


Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need for this newline here

@OneUpWallStreet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks much better now, thank you! There is only a couple of newline changes I don’t think are necessary.

Thank you @xedin, I removed the extra newlines. Please let me know if there's anything else I need to do.

@OneUpWallStreet OneUpWallStreet requested a review from xedin July 4, 2021 07:03
@xedin
Copy link
Contributor

xedin commented Jul 4, 2021

@swift-ci please smoke test

@OneUpWallStreet
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

Thank you for taking the time and approving my request @xedin 😄

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor

xedin commented Jul 4, 2021

@swift-ci please smoke test

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor

xedin commented Jul 5, 2021

@swift-ci please smoke test

@xedin xedin merged commit 25df5d2 into swiftlang:main Jul 5, 2021
@@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ static bool hasSameUltimateSuccessor(SILBasicBlock *noneBB, SILBasicBlock *someB

// Otherwise, lets begin a traversal along the successors of noneSuccessorBB,
// searching for someSuccessorBB, being careful to only allow for blocks to be
// visited once. This enables us to guarantee that there are not any loops or
// visited once. This enables us to guarantee that there no loops or
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is missing a word.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants