Skip to content

We don't need the default implementation of RNG.next() to be ABI #38272

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

stephentyrone
Copy link
Contributor

@stephentyrone stephentyrone commented Jul 6, 2021

Make it @_aEIC so that we're not stuck with it forever if we get a better solution someday.

… be ABI.

Make it @_aEIC so that we're not stuck with it forever if we get a better solution someday.
@stephentyrone
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test and merge

Copy link
Contributor

@glessard glessard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stephentyrone stephentyrone deleted the unavailable-defaults-dont-need-to-be-abi branch July 6, 2021 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants