[ResultBuilders] A couple pattern matching fixes to make it consistent with TypeCheckPattern
#39458
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tuple splat/implosion is (still) allowed for patterns (with a warning in Swift 5)
so we need to use
SingleApply
while looking up members to make sure that e.g.case test(x: Int, y: Int)
gets the labels preserved when matched withcase let .test(tuple)
andCompound
when associated values form a tuple pattern.TypeCheckPattern
for paren patternsA single paren pattern becomes a labeled tuple pattern e.g.
case .test(let value):
should be able to match
case test(result: Int)
. Note that it also means that:cast test(result: (String, Int))
would be matched against e.g.case .test((let x, let y))
but that fails during pattern coercion (behavior consistent with what happens in
TypeCheckPattern
).