Skip to content

Always weak-link symbols from the concurrency library when back-deploying #40008

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

DougGregor
Copy link
Member

This allows applications that back-deploy but only use concurrency in
newer code to load and execute properly, even when the concurrency library
is not available. Fixes rdar://84877644.

…ying

This allows applications that back-deploy but only use concurrency in
newer code to load and execute properly, even when the concurrency library
is not available. Fixes rdar://84877644.
@DougGregor DougGregor requested a review from a team as a code owner November 1, 2021 23:54
@DougGregor DougGregor added the r5.5 label Nov 1, 2021
@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

swift-ci commented Nov 2, 2021

Build failed
Swift Test OS X Platform
Git Sha - e944604

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please smoke test macOS

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test Windows

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test macos

Copy link
Member

@etcwilde etcwilde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@DougGregor DougGregor merged commit 61ad514 into swiftlang:release/5.5 Nov 3, 2021
@DougGregor DougGregor deleted the back-deploy-concurrency-weak-5.5 branch November 3, 2021 05:57
@AnthonyLatsis AnthonyLatsis added 🍒 release cherry pick Flag: Release branch cherry picks swift 5.5 labels Jan 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🍒 release cherry pick Flag: Release branch cherry picks swift 5.5
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants