Skip to content

cross-module-optimization: be more conservative when emitting a TBD file. #41642

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2022

Conversation

eeckstein
Copy link
Contributor

If we are emitting a TBD file, the TBD file only contains public symbols of this module.
But not public symbols of imported modules which are statically linked to the current binary.
This prevents referencing public symbols from other modules which could (potentially) linked statically.
Unfortunately there is no way to find out if another module is linked statically or dynamically, so we have to be conservative.

Fixes an unresolved-symbol linker error.
rdar://89364148

…ile.

If we are emitting a TBD file, the TBD file only contains public symbols of this module.
But not public symbols of imported modules which are statically linked to the current binary.
This prevents referencing public symbols from other modules which could (potentially) linked statically.
Unfortunately there is no way to find out if another module is linked statically or dynamically, so we have to be conservative.

Fixes an unresolved-symbol linker error.
rdar://89364148
@eeckstein
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci test

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant