Skip to content

Do not assume Set/Dictionary are always bound generic types. #5627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2016
Merged

Do not assume Set/Dictionary are always bound generic types. #5627

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2016

Conversation

rudkx
Copy link
Contributor

@rudkx rudkx commented Nov 3, 2016

In cases where we cannot infer the types they won't be, so we don't want
to just cast to BoundGenericType when we see these.

Fixes rdar://problem/28317710 and at least one dup (and I think a few
more).

In cases where we cannot infer the types they won't be, so we don't want
to just cast to BoundGenericType when we see these.

Fixes rdar://problem/28317710 and at least one dup (and I think a few
more).
@rudkx rudkx self-assigned this Nov 3, 2016
@rudkx
Copy link
Contributor Author

rudkx commented Nov 3, 2016

@swift-ci Please smoke test and merge.

@rudkx
Copy link
Contributor Author

rudkx commented Nov 3, 2016

@swift-ci Please smoke test Linux platform

1 similar comment
@rudkx
Copy link
Contributor Author

rudkx commented Nov 3, 2016

@swift-ci Please smoke test Linux platform

@rudkx rudkx merged commit f7d94d9 into swiftlang:master Nov 3, 2016
@rudkx rudkx deleted the fix-rdar28317710 branch November 3, 2016 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant