Skip to content

Gate the swift-remoteast-test tests on the target matching the host. #5688

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

rjmccall
Copy link
Contributor

@rjmccall rjmccall commented Nov 8, 2016

swift-remoteast-test uses the JIT to execute code in its own process.
Even if we theoretically taught the interpreter to perform some sort
of remote interpretation, that would not be sufficient to make
swift-remoteast-test work. Therefore I've introduced a new lit
feature check specifically for swift-remoteast-test, but set it by
default to be equivalent to swift_interpreter.

Resolves rdar://29103551, in which we managed to build Swift for iOS without having first built a Mac OS X stdlib — a completely reasonable configuration, but one we apparently don't regularly do.

swift-remoteast-test uses the JIT to execute code in its own process.
Even if we theoretically taught the interpreter to perform some sort
of remote interpretation, that would not be sufficient to make
swift-remoteast-test work.  Therefore I've introduced a new lit
feature check specifically for swift-remoteast-test, but set it by
default to be equivalent to swift_interpreter.
@rjmccall
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjmccall commented Nov 8, 2016

@swift-ci Please smoke test and merge.

@swift-ci swift-ci merged commit d703c90 into swiftlang:master Nov 8, 2016
@rjmccall rjmccall deleted the swift-remoteast-test-lit-feature branch November 8, 2016 21:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants