[Distributed] cleanup existential check in SerReq checking #59404
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xedin
reviewed
Jun 13, 2022
ktoso
force-pushed
the
wip-cleanup-ser-req-cant-be-nonproto
branch
from
8e314a7 to
0edd0f0
Compare
|
@swift-ci please smoke test and merge |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Review followup for [Distributed] Require that SerReq can only be used with protocols #42348
Following up on review comments in #42348 (comment)
Is this right now @hborla @xedin ?
I wanted to also follow up on what @DougGregor said there but I wasn't entirely sure how exactly do understand the hint there 🤔