Skip to content

[5.7][CSSimplify] Allow referencing typealias declarations via leading-dot… #60134

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2022

Conversation

xedin
Copy link
Contributor

@xedin xedin commented Jul 19, 2022

… syntax in generic context

Cherry-pick of #60080


  • Explanation:

Previously only static methods found on protocols were allowed but
it is reasonable to reference a typealias to perform an implicit call
to .init on its underlying type.

Resolves: rdar://88513939
(cherry picked from commit 1277618)

… syntax in generic context

Previously only static methods found on protocols were allowed but
it is reasonable to reference a typealias to perform an implicit call
to `.init` on its underlying type.

Resolves: rdar://88513939
(cherry picked from commit 1277618)
@xedin xedin added the r5.7 label Jul 19, 2022
@xedin xedin requested a review from a team as a code owner July 19, 2022 16:58
@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jul 19, 2022

@swift-ci please test

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jul 19, 2022

@swift-ci please clean test macOS platform

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jul 19, 2022

@swift-ci please nominate

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jul 19, 2022

@swift-ci please test macOS platform

@xedin xedin merged commit 99a644e into swiftlang:release/5.7 Jul 20, 2022
@AnthonyLatsis AnthonyLatsis added 🍒 release cherry pick Flag: Release branch cherry picks swift 5.7 labels Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🍒 release cherry pick Flag: Release branch cherry picks swift 5.7
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants