Skip to content

[move-only] Rather than calling the borrow to destructure transform from the MoveOnlyObjectChecker, make its own pass. #63270

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor

This is a cleaner separation of concerns. The reason why I did not do this originally is that I thought I would need to reuse this functionality in the address checker, but this issue actually does not come up there since we project the address and then load instead of load and then project.

…rom the MoveOnlyObjectChecker, make its own pass.

This is a cleaner separation of concerns. The reason why I did not do this
originally is that I thought I would need to reuse this functionality in the
address checker, but this issue actually does not come up there since we project
the address and then load instead of load and then project.
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test

@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Windows failure is something in concurrency.

@gottesmm gottesmm merged commit c9ce3a9 into swiftlang:main Jan 28, 2023
@gottesmm gottesmm deleted the pr-58e55bb70e30107d86e3c437c972c9f0adbce7b4 branch January 28, 2023 01:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant