[Macros] Fix visiting nested conformance macro declarations in SIL and IRGen. #65231
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When expanding a conformance macro, the generated extension decls are added to the
TopLevelDecls
vector of the synthesized file unit to expose them tosf->getSynthesizedFile()->getTopLevelDecls()
. There are two problems with this:visitAuxiliaryDecls()
for the purpose of type checking. This causes problems in code generation because the extensions are visited separately, and because SIL and IRGen assume nested auxiliary decls are members.To fix this in the short term, visit top-level decls in the synthesized file that are generated by conformance macros, and skip auxiliary extension decls when emitting type members. This fix is narrowly scoped to only impact macros, but in the future this warrants a more structural fix to better handle top-level decls in the synthesized file.
Fixes rdar://107962528.