A couple of bridging cleanups #69534
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hamishknight
requested review from
hborla,
slavapestov,
xedin,
zoecarver and
CodaFi
as code owners
Define using the wrapper macro.
Migrate a bunch of structs to classes, and uppercase field names.
We can now use the constructors on the bridged wrappers, and `unbridged` methods.
|
@swift-ci please test |
bnbarham
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #69440. Rename
get()tounbridged(), improve some bridging interfaces, and removeunbridged+bridgedfree functions.