-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
[CMake] Respect LLVM instrumentation variables in AddPureSwift.cmake #71135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is LLD a requirement?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original code does not explain why those conditions are needed. The original commit that introduced the conditions doesn't explain it either: swiftlang/llvm-project@a84b200
The
stable/20230725
code is in https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/blob/stable/20230725/llvm/cmake/modules/HandleLLVMOptions.cmake#L1095-L1133The linker options are only added for cases that are
NOT LINKER_IS_LLD_LINK
The values of
LINKER_IS_LLD_LINK
comes from https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/blob/stable/20230725/llvm/cmake/modules/HandleLLVMOptions.cmake#L20-L30If I had read the things correctly, the requirements for
LINKER_IS_LLD_LINK
is that we are usingMSVC
(eitherclang-cl
or the actualcl
) and using LLD to link, which if I had translated correctly should happen whenSWIFT_COMPILER_IS_MSVC_LIKE
and whenSWIFT_USE_LINKER
islld
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Am I just failing to apply DeMorgan's Law? NOT (MSVC AND LLD) -> NOT MSVC OR NOT LLD. It would make sense as AND (NOT MSVC OR LLD).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's see if I remember doing these things:
For the version that I think I implemented, the only
F
is whenMSVC
andLLD
are bothT
, which I think is the case in the original code. For the proposed version the case when MSVC and LLD isT
, and the case of using MSVC but not LLD isF
, which I think is the opposite of what we want.PD: logic is hard, let's go shopping, and all the normal disclosures when doing booleans.