Skip to content

test: Fix IRGen/moveonly_value_functions.swift for 32-bit targets #71834

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

kateinoigakukun
Copy link
Member

https://ci-external.swift.org/job/oss-swift-RA-linux-ubuntu-20.04-webassembly/1969/

/home/buildbot/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-RA-linux-ubuntu-20.04-webassembly/swift/test/IRGen/moveonly_value_functions.swift:141:16: error: CHECK-SAME: expected string not found in input
// CHECK-SAME: i64 0,
               ^
<stdin>:650:110: note: scanning from here
 %1 = call swiftcc %swift.metadata_response @"$s24moveonly_value_functions28InnerDeinitingDestructableNCVMa"(i32 0, ptr %T) #15
                                                                                                             ^

Input file: <stdin>
Check file: /home/buildbot/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-RA-linux-ubuntu-20.04-webassembly/swift/test/IRGen/moveonly_value_functions.swift

-dump-input=help explains the following input dump.

Input was:
<<<<<<
          .
          .
          .
        645: } 
        646:  
        647: define swiftcc void @"$s24moveonly_value_functions13takeOuterNC_2yyAA0eF2_2VyxGnlF"(ptr noalias %0, ptr %T) #0 { 
        648: entry: 
        649:  call swiftcc void @external_symbol() #16 
        650:  %1 = call swiftcc %swift.metadata_response @"$s24moveonly_value_functions28InnerDeinitingDestructableNCVMa"(i32 0, ptr %T) #15 
same:141                                                                                                                  X~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ error: no match found
        651:  %2 = extractvalue %swift.metadata_response %1, 0 
same:141     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        652:  %3 = call swiftcc %swift.metadata_response @"$s24moveonly_value_functions9OuterNC_2VMa"(i32 0, ptr %T) #15 
same:141     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        653:  %4 = extractvalue %swift.metadata_response %3, 0 
same:141     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        654:  %5 = call ptr @"$s24moveonly_value_functions9OuterNC_2VyxGlWOh"(ptr %0, ptr %T, ptr %2, ptr %4) 
same:141     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        655:  ret void 
same:141     ~~~~~~~~~~

@kateinoigakukun
Copy link
Member Author

preset=buildbot_linux_crosscompile_wasm
@swift-ci Please test with preset Linux Platform

@kateinoigakukun
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test

@kateinoigakukun kateinoigakukun force-pushed the yt/repair-32bit-moveonly-test branch from 3f5c268 to 8a2936b Compare February 23, 2024 14:42
@kateinoigakukun
Copy link
Member Author

preset=buildbot_linux_crosscompile_wasm
@swift-ci Please test with preset Linux Platform

@kateinoigakukun
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test

Copy link
Contributor

@nate-chandler nate-chandler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, I didn't mean to check this line at all. Thanks!

@nate-chandler nate-chandler marked this pull request as ready for review February 23, 2024 14:57
@nate-chandler nate-chandler merged commit d6824a7 into swiftlang:main Feb 23, 2024
@kateinoigakukun kateinoigakukun deleted the yt/repair-32bit-moveonly-test branch February 23, 2024 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants