Skip to content

[Cherry-pick] [DebugInfo] Generate debug info for specialized types #72442

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

augusto2112
Copy link
Contributor

Specialized types are generic types, or types whose parent is specialized.

IRGenDebugInfo was previously mistankenly emitting debug info for nominal specialized types as if they regular nominal types, which caused problems as that code path does not handle references to generic parameters.

(cherry picked from commit ae5e341)

Specialized types are generic types, or types whose parent is
specialized.

IRGenDebugInfo was previously mistankenly emitting debug info for
nominal specialized types as if they regular nominal types, which caused
problems as that code path does not handle references to generic
parameters.

(cherry picked from commit ae5e341)
@augusto2112 augusto2112 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 19, 2024 22:37
@augusto2112
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci test

@tbkka
Copy link
Contributor

tbkka commented Mar 20, 2024

... cherry picked from commit ae5e341)

I really prefer that you reference the original PR rather than a commit. That makes it easy to look at the discussion attached to the original PR.

@augusto2112
Copy link
Contributor Author

... cherry picked from commit ae5e341)

I really prefer that you reference the original PR rather than a commit. That makes it easy to look at the discussion attached to the original PR.

Hi Tim, ok. The pr is #72338

@augusto2112 augusto2112 merged commit a3b4d06 into swiftlang:release/6.0 Mar 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants