[RelatedIdents] Fix an assertion failure if two invalid declarations have the same base name #73524
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…have the same base name
For example, the following declarations have the same USR with a single ERROR_TYPE parameter despite being distinct declarations.
```swift
func bar(body: Invalid) {}
func bar(ignoreCase: Bool, body: Invalid) {}
```
We originally intended to check the USR so that local rename behaves more like global rename, which also looks symbols up by USR. But the above example proves that assumption wrong.
rdar://126803702
|
@swift-ci Please test |
bnbarham
approved these changes
May 9, 2024
ahoppen
deleted the
6.0/related-idents-of-invalid-decls-with-same-base-name
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We originally intended to check the USR so that local rename behaves more like global rename, which also looks symbols up by USR. But the above example proves that assumption wrong.