[cxx-interop] SWIFT_RETURNS_INDEPENDENT_VALUE implies immortal lifetime #77294
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Xazax-hun
requested review from
zoecarver,
hyp,
egorzhdan,
beccadax and
ian-twilightcoder
as code owners
Xazax-hun
changed the title
|
@swift-ci please smoke test |
egorzhdan
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2024
…etime The semantics of returning independent value already matches what immortal lifetimes are within Swift. This patch makes sure this annotation works as expected with non-escapable types. rdar://137671642
Xazax-hun
force-pushed
the
gaborh/import-return-independent-as-immortal
branch
from
40d7fcf to
17ef2f6
Compare
|
@swift-ci please smoke test |
|
@swift-ci please smoke test windows |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The semantics of returning independent value already matches what immortal lifetimes are within Swift. This patch makes sure this annotation works as expected with non-escapable types.
rdar://137671642