Skip to content

[NFC][CMake] Disable use of in-process 'libSwiftScan' queries when building the Standard Library #77601

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

artemcm
Copy link
Contributor

@artemcm artemcm commented Nov 13, 2024

Due to the ordering of our build system, we may encounter a race when building standard library variants using tools produced by Swift's 'tools' CMake build. As a workaround, for now, ensure that the compiler building standard library variants does not rely on libSwiftScan built as part of 'tools'.

…ilding the Standard Library

Due to the ordering of our build system, we may encounter a race when building standard library variants using tools produced by Swift's 'tools' CMake build.
As a workaround, for now, ensure that the compiler building standard library variants does not rely on libSwiftScan built as part of 'tools'.
@artemcm artemcm requested a review from etcwilde November 13, 2024 23:15
@artemcm artemcm requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2024 23:15
@artemcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

artemcm commented Nov 13, 2024

@swift-ci smoke test

@artemcm artemcm enabled auto-merge November 13, 2024 23:17
Copy link
Member

@etcwilde etcwilde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@artemcm artemcm merged commit 4190411 into swiftlang:main Nov 14, 2024
3 checks passed
@artemcm artemcm deleted the DisableLibSwiftScanOnStdLib branch November 14, 2024 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants