Skip to content

Revert "Merge pull request #77609 Task names" #79562

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2025

Conversation

ktoso
Copy link
Contributor

@ktoso ktoso commented Feb 23, 2025

This reverts commit 4ab5d26.

Reverts #77609

There was some source compatibility issues with the move to gyb, so I'll investigate and fix those.

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 23, 2025

@swift-ci please smoke test

@ktoso ktoso enabled auto-merge (squash) February 23, 2025 04:56
@ktoso ktoso changed the title Revert "Merge pull request #77609 from ktoso/wip-task-names" Revert "Merge pull request #77609 Task names" Feb 23, 2025
@xedin
Copy link
Contributor

xedin commented Feb 23, 2025

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

@ktoso ktoso force-pushed the revert-task-names-source-compat branch from 5fb3ca0 to f0fa8ee Compare February 23, 2025 05:19
@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 23, 2025

@swift-ci please smoke test

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 23, 2025

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

@ktoso
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktoso commented Feb 24, 2025

@swift-ci please smoke test windows

@ktoso ktoso merged commit 09003d6 into swiftlang:main Feb 24, 2025
5 checks passed
ktoso added a commit to ktoso/swift that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
ktoso added a commit to ktoso/swift that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2025
ktoso added a commit to ktoso/swift that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2025
ktoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants