[Runtime] Change the unowned reference fatal error to "was already destroyed." #81041
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…stroyed." The "was already deallocated" message is incorrect, since the target of an unowned reference stays allocated even after being deinitialized. We could say "was already deinitialized" but that's a bit of a niche term. "Was already destroyed" conveys what happened without the reader needing to worry about deinitialization versus deallocation. rdar://149237704
al45tair
approved these changes
Apr 28, 2025
|
@swift-ci please test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "was already deallocated" message is incorrect, since the target of an unowned reference stays allocated even after being deinitialized. We could say "was already deinitialized" but that's a bit of a niche term. "Was already destroyed" conveys what happened without the reader needing to worry about deinitialization versus deallocation.
rdar://149237704