Skip to content

[swift-4.0-branch][stdlib] New overload for joined() #9169

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2017

Conversation

moiseev
Copy link
Contributor

@moiseev moiseev commented May 1, 2017

Now that String conforms to the BidirectionalCollection protocol, in
the expression let x = [""].joined() the best matching overload for
joined is no longer the one returning String.

Fixes: rdar://problem/31899440

Now that `String` conforms to the `BidirectionalCollection` protocol, in
the expression `let x = [""].joined()` the best matching overload for
`joined` is no longer the one returning `String`.

Fixes: <rdar://problem/31899440>
@moiseev
Copy link
Contributor Author

moiseev commented May 1, 2017

@swift-ci Please smoke test

@najacque
Copy link
Contributor

najacque commented May 2, 2017

@swift-ci please smoke test

@najacque
Copy link
Contributor

najacque commented May 2, 2017

Re-running tests

@najacque
Copy link
Contributor

najacque commented May 2, 2017

Linux failure is a swiftpm issue, it's being investigated.

@najacque
Copy link
Contributor

najacque commented May 2, 2017

Yay, both tests are good now. Merging.

@najacque
Copy link
Contributor

najacque commented May 2, 2017

Actually, I'll do full tests first.

@najacque
Copy link
Contributor

najacque commented May 2, 2017

@swift-ci Please test and merge

@swift-ci swift-ci merged commit aaaea05 into swiftlang:swift-4.0-branch May 2, 2017
@moiseev moiseev deleted the joined-4 branch May 2, 2017 16:37
@moiseev
Copy link
Contributor Author

moiseev commented May 2, 2017

Thanks, @najacque !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants