-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
Updated configuration for the new Asset component #5170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
javiereguiluz
wants to merge
3
commits into
symfony:2.7
from
javiereguiluz:update_asset_configuration
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you think a note should be added here as well? https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/2.7/UPGRADE-2.7.md I found a lot of changes are passing unreported.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cordoval UPGRADE file should only contain breaking changes, CHANGELOG files of each component/bundle/bridge will contain all changes (including non-BC changes like this).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i guess i have misunderstood what breaking means then. This definitely broke his system 👴. But yeah it is not i guess in the BC promise?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's weird, as there is a BC layer: https://github.com/symfony/FrameworkBundle/blob/2.7/DependencyInjection/Configuration.php#L79-113 (triggering a deprecation notice is not breaking)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cordoval Can you give an example how this broke a system?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there is a ticket on symfony/symfony about this that I referenced it symfony/symfony#14332
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, that's no breaking change, but is a misconfiguration of the templating system.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
correct, but i see this happening more often, things are a bit cryptic for the people that is migrating to 2.7 since they have to be savvy in debugging things like this. I am cool either way, just pointing things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I agree - this should have been in the UPGRADE log (the change of the configuration). Strictly speaking, there are no BC breaks on minor version changes, so the UPGRADE log is for exactly stuff like this - big changes where some old way of doing something still works, but is deprecated (check out the Form section of UPGRADE-2.7.md). I've seen a few people complain about the asset stuff being missing from UPGRADE.