Skip to content

Added a small note about dynamic role hierarchies #9865

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions security.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1254,6 +1254,16 @@ In the above configuration, users with ``ROLE_ADMIN`` role will also have the
``ROLE_USER`` role. The ``ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN`` role has ``ROLE_ADMIN``, ``ROLE_ALLOWED_TO_SWITCH``
and ``ROLE_USER`` (inherited from ``ROLE_ADMIN``).

.. note::

The role hierarchy defined in the ``role_hierarchy`` option is static and
you cannot override it dynamically (for example to store the role hierarchy
in a database). If you need that, create a custom
:doc:`security voter </security/voters>` that looks for the user roles in
the database. Another solution is to create a service that implements the
Copy link
Contributor

@dmaicher dmaicher Jun 1, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe One solution is ... instead of Another ...? because technically creating your own RoleHierarchyVoter is exactly what the previous sentence suggests? 😊

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I think its fine as it is 😊

``RoleHierarchyInterface`` and inject it into your own ``RoleHierarchyVoter``
service.

Final Words
-----------

Expand Down