Fix decoration
utility ambiguity
#6217
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR makes
decoration-[3px]
work automatically.The main reason for the
any
type is so that we don't have to parse thevalue and can assume that this plugin handles "any" value you give it.
This is useful because
decoration-[var(--something)]
would becorrectly translated to the correct decoration property. However, we
introduce another plugin with the same
decoration
prefix.This means that now both
textDecorationColor
andtextDecorationThickness
have the same base utility name:decoration
.textDecorationColor
had ['color', 'any']textDecorationThickness
had ['length', 'percentage']This means that
3px
fit both in thelength
data type of thetextDecorationThickness
plugin and in theany
data type of thetextDecorationColor
plugin.Removing the
any
fixes this.TL;DR: Only have
any
when there are no conflicting utility names.