db efficiency improvements #1657
Conversation
- remove calls to findUnique, especially when including/selecting relations - add some missing indexes - add spans to $transaction calls to help track down long running txs
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
apps/webapp/app/db.server.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.45.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "custom" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "custom" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc.js". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/ApiBatchResultsPresenter.server.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.45.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "custom" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "custom" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc.js". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/EnvironmentVariablesPresenter.server.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.45.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "custom" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "custom" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc.js". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.
WalkthroughThe changes update various database interactions throughout the codebase. In the core database module, the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant DBServer
participant Prisma
Client->>DBServer: Call $transaction(fnOrName, fnOrOptions, options)
alt String overload provided
DBServer->>DBServer: Start a tracing span using provided string
else Function overload provided
DBServer->>DBServer: Execute transaction function directly
end
DBServer->>Prisma: Execute DB queries (using findFirst variants)
Prisma-->>DBServer: Return query result
DBServer-->>Client: Return transaction result with span context
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@trigger.dev/build
@trigger.dev/react-hooks
trigger.dev
@trigger.dev/rsc
@trigger.dev/sdk
@trigger.dev/core
commit: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (6)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/cancelTaskAttemptDependencies.server.ts (1)
9-27: Consider keepingfindUniquefor primary key lookup.Since we're querying by
id(likely a primary key), usingfindUniquewould be more appropriate and potentially more efficient thanfindFirst.- const taskAttempt = await this._prisma.taskRunAttempt.findFirst({ + const taskAttempt = await this._prisma.taskRunAttempt.findUnique({Additionally, consider optimizing the deep includes by selecting only necessary fields.
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/performDeploymentAlerts.server.ts (1)
10-15: Consider keepingfindUniquefor primary key lookup.Since we're querying by
id(likely a primary key), usingfindUniquewould be more appropriate and potentially more efficient thanfindFirst.- const deployment = await this._prisma.workerDeployment.findFirst({ + const deployment = await this._prisma.workerDeployment.findUnique({apps/webapp/app/v3/services/expireEnqueuedRun.server.ts (1)
22-34: Consider keepingfindUniquefor primary key lookup.Since we're querying by
id(likely a primary key), usingfindUniquewould be more appropriate and potentially more efficient thanfindFirst.- const run = await this._prisma.taskRun.findFirst({ + const run = await this._prisma.taskRun.findUnique({Additionally, consider optimizing the deep includes by selecting only necessary fields.
apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/TasksStreamPresenter.server.ts (1)
36-51: Subject: Potential Issue: Missing Uniqueness Enforcement for Project Slug within OrganizationThe investigation did not reveal any unique constraint (neither a Prisma
@@unique([slug, organizationId])nor a database unique index) governing the combination ofprojectSlugandorganizationSlug. This implies that usingfindFirstmight return unpredictable (or non-deterministic) results if duplicate records exist.
- No unique constraint is found in the Prisma schema.
- No unique indexes are present in the migration files.
Please review and enforce a uniqueness constraint if appropriate, or adjust the logic and related database validations accordingly.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify uniqueness constraints for project slug within organization.
The change from
findUniquetofindFirstassumes that the combination ofprojectSlugandorganizationSlugis unique. Please verify this assumption to prevent potential issues with returning unexpected projects.
I'm not seeing conclusive evidence from the first command. Let's run additional scripts to verify that the database (or Prisma schema) enforces a unique constraint for the combination of project slug and organization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any duplicate project slugs within the same organization ast-grep --pattern 'CREATE UNIQUE INDEX $_ ON "Project" ("slug", "organizationId")'Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "Searching for unique constraints in the Prisma schema (e.g., @@unique([slug, organizationId])):" rg '@@unique\(\[.*slug.*organizationId.*\]\)' -n . echo "" echo "Searching for unique index definitions in migration files:" rg 'CREATE UNIQUE INDEX' -n prisma/migrations || echo "No unique indexes found in migrations"Length of output: 582
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createCheckpointRestoreEvent.server.ts (1)
31-35: UsefindUniquefor unique identifier queries.
The Prisma schema confirms that both theidandfriendlyIdfields are defined as unique (with@idand@unique, respectively). Since the queried field (id) is unique, it is more appropriate and semantically correct to usefindUniquerather thanfindFirst.
- File: apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createCheckpointRestoreEvent.server.ts (Lines 31-35 and 47-59)
- Recommendation: Replace
findFirstqueries withfindUniquewhen querying by these unique identifiers.🔗 Analysis chain
Verify if
findFirstis the optimal choice for querying by unique identifiers.While the change from
findUniquetofindFirstaligns with the PR's efficiency improvements, both queries use what appear to be unique identifiers (idandfriendlyId). If these fields have unique constraints,findUniquemight be more appropriate.Let's verify the schema constraints:
Also applies to: 47-59
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if id and friendlyId are unique fields in the schema # Test: Search for unique constraints on these fields in the Prisma schema # Expected: Find unique constraints for both fields rg -A 5 'model (Checkpoint|TaskRun)' | rg -A 10 '(id|friendlyId).*@(id|unique)'Length of output: 3336
apps/webapp/app/v3/marqs/devQueueConsumer.server.ts (1)
84-89: Review Verification Result: Missing Unique Constraints DetectedOur investigation could not locate any unique constraint definitions enforcing the combination of
friendlyIdandruntimeEnvironmentIdfor the BackgroundWorker model or enforcing uniqueness offriendlyIdin the TaskRunAttempt model in the Prisma schema located at./references/v3-catalog/prisma/schema/schema.prisma. This absence implies that usingfindFirstfor record retrieval may return non-unique results if duplicates exist.
- BackgroundWorker: No evidence was found that the combination of
friendlyIdandruntimeEnvironmentIdis enforced as unique.- TaskRunAttempt: No evidence was found that
friendlyIdis enforced as unique.Please review and, if appropriate, add the necessary unique constraints to ensure data integrity.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify uniqueness constraints for background worker and task run attempt retrieval.
The changes from
findUniquetofindFirstcould potentially return unexpected records if multiple entries match the criteria. Ensure that:
- The combination of
friendlyIdandruntimeEnvironmentIdmaintains uniqueness for background workers- The
friendlyIdmaintains uniqueness for task run attemptsRun the following script to check for potential duplicates:
Also applies to: 173-175
Please run this script to verify that:
- The BackgroundWorker model enforces uniqueness on the combination of
friendlyIdandruntimeEnvironmentId.- The TaskRunAttempt model enforces uniqueness on
friendlyId.If no unique constraints are present, or if the definitions differ from your expectations, then further action may be required.
Please run the above script to gather further details on whether:
- The BackgroundWorker model enforces uniqueness on the combination of
friendlyIdandruntimeEnvironmentId.- The TaskRunAttempt model enforces uniqueness on
friendlyId.Based on the output, we can determine if the current usage of
findFirstin the code is safe or if the schema is missing the expected constraints.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unique constraints on background workers and task run attempts # Test: Search for unique constraint or index definitions ast-grep --pattern $'model BackgroundWorker { $$$ @@unique([$_]) $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern $'model TaskRunAttempt { $$$ @@unique([$_]) $$$ }'Length of output: 155
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the prisma schema file and check unique constraints for the BackgroundWorker # and TaskRunAttempt models to verify that uniqueness constraints exist as expected. # Find the prisma schema file (typically named schema.prisma) schema_file=$(fd "schema.prisma" -n) echo "Schema file: $schema_file" echo "" echo "=== Checking BackgroundWorker model for unique constraints (combination of friendlyId and runtimeEnvironmentId) ===" rg -A 50 'model BackgroundWorker' "$schema_file" | grep -E '@(unique|@@unique)' echo "" echo "=== Checking TaskRunAttempt model for unique constraints (friendlyId) ===" rg -A 50 'model TaskRunAttempt' "$schema_file" | grep -E '@(unique|@@unique)'Length of output: 945
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the prisma schema file using the "find" command and print out the model definitions for # BackgroundWorker and TaskRunAttempt to manually verify that unique constraints exist where expected. # # This script avoids using fd flags that cause errors and directly uses find to locate the schema file. # Locate the prisma schema file schema_file=$(find . -type f -name "schema.prisma" | head -n1) if [ -z "$schema_file" ]; then echo "schema.prisma file not found." exit 1 fi echo "Schema file: $schema_file" echo "" # Print the BackgroundWorker model definition (until the next model starts) echo "=== BackgroundWorker Model Definition ===" awk '/model BackgroundWorker/{flag=1} flag && /^model / && !/model BackgroundWorker/ {flag=0} flag {print}' "$schema_file" echo "" # Print the TaskRunAttempt model definition (until the next model starts) echo "=== TaskRunAttempt Model Definition ===" awk '/model TaskRunAttempt/{flag=1} flag && /^model / && !/model TaskRunAttempt/ {flag=0} flag {print}' "$schema_file"Length of output: 843
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Print the full definitions of the BackgroundWorker and TaskRunAttempt models # and search for any unique constraint indicators (both inline @unique and block @@unique) # in the Prisma schema file to verify that the expected uniqueness constraints are in place. # Locate the prisma schema file schema_file=$(find . -type f -name "schema.prisma" | head -n1) if [ -z "$schema_file" ]; then echo "schema.prisma file not found." exit 1 fi echo "Schema file: $schema_file" echo "" # Print full model definition for BackgroundWorker (from its declaration until the next model declaration) echo "=== Full BackgroundWorker Model Definition ===" sed -n '/model BackgroundWorker/,/model /p' "$schema_file" echo "" # Print full model definition for TaskRunAttempt (from its declaration until the next model declaration) echo "=== Full TaskRunAttempt Model Definition ===" sed -n '/model TaskRunAttempt/,/model /p' "$schema_file" echo "" # Search for unique constraint indicators in the entire schema file echo "=== Searching for unique constraint indicators ('@unique' and '@@unique') ===" rg '@(unique|@@unique)' "$schema_file"Length of output: 1003
🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133220_add_missing_checkpoint_restore_event_checkpoint_id_index/migration.sql (1)
1-1: Comment Clarity and Context
The comment-- CreateIndexis simple and informs the reader that an index is being created. If further detail is available about the performance improvements expected from this index, consider adding a bit more context in the comment.apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createDeployedBackgroundWorker.server.ts (1)
40-98: Consider using a transaction for atomic operations.The background worker creation and deployment update are separate database operations. Consider wrapping them in a transaction to ensure atomicity and reduce the number of database round trips.
Here's how you could refactor this:
- const backgroundWorker = await this._prisma.backgroundWorker.create({ - data: { - friendlyId: generateFriendlyId("worker"), - version: deployment.version, - runtimeEnvironmentId: environment.id, - projectId: environment.projectId, - metadata: body.metadata, - contentHash: body.metadata.contentHash, - cliVersion: body.metadata.cliPackageVersion, - sdkVersion: body.metadata.packageVersion, - supportsLazyAttempts: body.supportsLazyAttempts, - }, - }); + const backgroundWorker = await this._prisma.$transaction(async (tx) => { + const worker = await tx.backgroundWorker.create({ + data: { + friendlyId: generateFriendlyId("worker"), + version: deployment.version, + runtimeEnvironmentId: environment.id, + projectId: environment.projectId, + metadata: body.metadata, + contentHash: body.metadata.contentHash, + cliVersion: body.metadata.cliPackageVersion, + sdkVersion: body.metadata.packageVersion, + supportsLazyAttempts: body.supportsLazyAttempts, + }, + }); + + await tx.workerDeployment.update({ + where: { + id: deployment.id, + }, + data: { + status: "DEPLOYED", + workerId: worker.id, + deployedAt: new Date(), + }, + }); + + return worker; + }, { + label: "create_background_worker_and_update_deployment", + });apps/webapp/app/db.server.ts (1)
37-95: Enhance error handling in nested transactions.
If a nested transaction or additional logic throws during the active span, ensure these errors are caught and traced properly. You might also log them within the span itself for more robust diagnostics.apps/webapp/app/v3/services/rescheduleTaskRun.server.ts (1)
20-20: LGTM! Consider adding more span attributes.The addition of the transaction name "reschedule run" improves traceability. Consider adding more span attributes like
run_idanddelayfor better debugging context.- return await $transaction(this._prisma, "reschedule run", async (tx) => { + return await $transaction(this._prisma, "reschedule run", async (tx, span) => { + span?.setAttribute("run_id", taskRun.id); + span?.setAttribute("delay", delay.toISOString());apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/ApiBatchResultsPresenter.server.ts (1)
12-32: LGTM! Consider adding an index for the query.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstaligns with the PR objectives. Consider adding a composite index on(friendlyId, runtimeEnvironmentId)to optimize this query.Add the following index to your Prisma schema:
model BatchTaskRun { @@index([friendlyId, runtimeEnvironmentId]) }apps/webapp/app/routes/api.v1.projects.$projectRef.envvars.ts (1)
29-38: LGTM! Consider adding an index for the query.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstaligns with the PR objectives. Consider adding a composite index on(externalRef)with an include on the environments relation to optimize this query.Add the following index to your Prisma schema:
model Project { @@index([externalRef]) }apps/webapp/app/v3/services/registerNextTaskScheduleInstance.server.ts (1)
8-16: LGTM! Consider adding an index for the query.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstaligns with the PR objectives. Consider adding an index onidto optimize this query.Add the following index to your Prisma schema:
model TaskScheduleInstance { @@index([id]) }apps/webapp/app/v3/services/upsertTaskSchedule.server.ts (1)
39-50: Consider using unique constraints for schedule lookups.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstsuggests there might be multiple records matching eitherfriendlyIdor the combination ofprojectIdanddeduplicationKey. This could lead to inconsistencies if multiple schedules exist with the same identifiers.Consider adding unique constraints in the database schema:
- A unique constraint on
friendlyIdif it's meant to be globally unique.- A composite unique constraint on
(projectId, deduplicationKey)if they should be unique within a project.apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createCheckpoint.server.ts (1)
33-50: Consider using unique constraints for attempt lookups.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstsuggests there might be multiple attempts with the samefriendlyId. This could lead to inconsistencies in checkpoint creation if multiple attempts exist with the same identifier.Consider adding a unique constraint on
friendlyIdin the database schema if it's meant to be globally unique across attempts.apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/SpanPresenter.server.ts (1)
32-36: Consider using unique constraints for project lookups.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstsuggests there might be multiple projects with the sameslug. This could lead to inconsistencies if multiple projects exist with the same slug.Consider adding a unique constraint on
slugin the database schema if it's meant to be globally unique across projects.apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/RunListPresenter.server.ts (1)
134-145: Consider using unique constraints for bulk action lookups.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstsuggests there might be multiple bulk actions with the samefriendlyId. This could lead to inconsistencies if multiple bulk actions exist with the same identifier.Consider adding a unique constraint on
friendlyIdin the database schema if it's meant to be globally unique across bulk actions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (53)
apps/webapp/app/db.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/ApiBatchResultsPresenter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/ApiRunResultPresenter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/DeploymentPresenter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/EnvironmentVariablesPresenter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/NewAlertChannelPresenter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/RunListPresenter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/RunStreamPresenter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/SpanPresenter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/TasksStreamPresenter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/api.v1.deployments.$deploymentId.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/api.v1.projects.$projectRef.envvars.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/api.v1.projects.$projectRef.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/services/autoIncrementCounter.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/environmentVariables/environmentVariablesRepository.server.ts(13 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/marqs/devQueueConsumer.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/requeueTaskRun.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/createAlertChannel.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/deliverAlert.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/performDeploymentAlerts.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/performTaskAttemptAlerts.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/performTaskRunAlerts.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/batchTriggerV3.server.ts(3 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/bulk/performBulkAction.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/cancelAttempt.server.ts(3 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/cancelDevSessionRuns.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/cancelTaskAttemptDependencies.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/completeAttempt.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createBackgroundWorker.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createCheckpoint.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createCheckpointRestoreEvent.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createDeployedBackgroundWorker.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createDeploymentBackgroundWorker.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createTaskRunAttempt.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/deploymentIndexFailed.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/enqueueDelayedRun.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/expireEnqueuedRun.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/indexDeployment.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/registerNextTaskScheduleInstance.server.ts(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/rescheduleTaskRun.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/restoreCheckpoint.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/timeoutDeployment.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/triggerScheduledTask.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/triggerTask.server.ts(6 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/services/upsertTaskSchedule.server.ts(2 hunks)internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203132941_add_missing_batch_task_run_dependent_task_attempt_id_index/migration.sql(1 hunks)internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133220_add_missing_checkpoint_restore_event_checkpoint_id_index/migration.sql(1 hunks)internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133324_add_missing_checkpoint_restore_event_run_id_index/migration.sql(1 hunks)internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133511_add_missing_task_run_dependency_dependent_attempt_id_index/migration.sql(1 hunks)internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133619_add_missing_task_run_dependency_dependent_batch_run_id_index/migration.sql(1 hunks)internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133835_add_missing_background_worker_runtime_environment_id_index/migration.sql(1 hunks)internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203134009_add_missing_background_worker_task_runtime_environment_id_project_id_index/migration.sql(1 hunks)internal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma(5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203134009_add_missing_background_worker_task_runtime_environment_id_project_id_index/migration.sql
- internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133835_add_missing_background_worker_runtime_environment_id_index/migration.sql
- internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203132941_add_missing_batch_task_run_dependent_task_attempt_id_index/migration.sql
- internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133324_add_missing_checkpoint_restore_event_run_id_index/migration.sql
- apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/performTaskRunAlerts.server.ts
- apps/webapp/app/services/autoIncrementCounter.server.ts
- internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133511_add_missing_task_run_dependency_dependent_attempt_id_index/migration.sql
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
- GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (45)
internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133220_add_missing_checkpoint_restore_event_checkpoint_id_index/migration.sql (1)
2-2: Index Creation with CONCURRENTLY and IF NOT EXISTS
The SQL statement correctly creates the index concurrently and only if it does not already exist, which helps avoid locking the table unnecessarily. However, note that in PostgreSQL theCREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLYcommand must be run outside of a transaction block. Ensure that your migration runner or tool is configured accordingly to avoid runtime errors.internal-packages/database/prisma/migrations/20250203133619_add_missing_task_run_dependency_dependent_batch_run_id_index/migration.sql (1)
1-2: Verify Transaction Context forCONCURRENTLYUsage.The index is created using
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF NOT EXISTS, which cannot run inside a transaction block in PostgreSQL. Please ensure that your migration runner or system executes this statement outside of any surrounding transaction to avoid runtime errors. Additionally, verify that combiningIF NOT EXISTSwithCONCURRENTLYis supported on your target PostgreSQL version.apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createDeployedBackgroundWorker.server.ts (1)
26-30: Verify uniqueness constraint and index onfriendlyId.The change from
findUniquetofindFirstaligns with the PR's goal of improving database efficiency. However, sincefriendlyIdappears to be a unique identifier, we should ensure it has the appropriate database constraints and indexes for optimal query performance.Let's verify the schema definition and indexes:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The Prisma schema confirms that
friendlyIdis unique and indexed.The
WorkerDeploymentmodel ininternal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prismadefines thefriendlyIdfield with the@uniqueconstraint, ensuring both uniqueness and an implicit index. This supports the change fromfindUniquetofindFirstwithout performance concerns.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if friendlyId has uniqueness constraint and index in the schema # Search for the WorkerDeployment model definition and any indexes on friendlyId rg -A 10 "model\s+WorkerDeployment\s*{" # Search for any existing index definitions on friendlyId rg "@@index\(\[.*friendlyId.*\]\)" rg "@@unique\(\[.*friendlyId.*\]\)"Length of output: 236
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the WorkerDeployment model and inspect the configuration for friendlyId in the Prisma schema. # Locate the prisma schema file (assuming it is located at prisma/schema.prisma) if [ -f prisma/schema.prisma ]; then echo "Found prisma/schema.prisma, searching for WorkerDeployment model..." rg -nH -A 10 'model\s+WorkerDeployment\s*\{' prisma/schema.prisma echo -e "\nSearching for 'friendlyId' references in prisma/schema.prisma..." rg -nH 'friendlyId' prisma/schema.prisma else echo "Could not locate prisma/schema.prisma. Please verify the schema file location." fiLength of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all prisma schema files in the repository and inspect them for the WorkerDeployment model # and any references to friendlyId, including potential uniqueness constraints and indexes. echo "Searching for 'schema.prisma' files in the repository..." fd --type file 'schema.prisma' echo -e "\nInspecting any discovered schema.prisma file(s) for WorkerDeployment model and friendlyId references..." for file in $(fd --type file 'schema.prisma'); do echo -e "\nFound schema file: $file" echo "-------------------------------" echo "WorkerDeployment model in $file:" rg -nH -A 10 'model\s+WorkerDeployment\s*\{' "$file" echo "-------------------------------" echo "References to friendlyId in $file:" rg -nH 'friendlyId' "$file" echo "-------------------------------" doneLength of output: 4532
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/createAlertChannel.server.ts (1)
53-59: Ensure uniqueness or clarify multi-record handling.
Switching fromfindUniquetofindFirstcan potentially allow multiple records with the samededuplicationKeyto exist in the database. If you need strict uniqueness, consider enforcing a unique constraint or fallback strategy to handle additional records.Would you like a script to scan for multiple
deduplicationKeyentries in the database and confirm no duplication is occurring?apps/webapp/app/db.server.ts (2)
16-17: Commendable approach to integrate tracing.
Bringing instartActiveSpanandSpanhelps add valuable observability to transaction flows.
26-31: Consider returning a strict type instead ofPromise<R | undefined>.
The function signature’sPromise<R | undefined>can lead to confusion — iffnmust returnR, then returningundefinedmight be unexpected. Evaluate if it should bePromise<R>or ensure a valid reason for handlingundefined.apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/ApiRunResultPresenter.server.ts (1)
12-24: Confirm intended behavior withfindFirst.
ReplacingfindUniquewithfindFirstallows multiple possible matches, returning effectively the “first” record. If there can be multiple tasks for the samefriendlyIdandruntimeEnvironmentId, this is fine. Otherwise, consider a uniqueness index or confirm that only one such record could ever exist.apps/webapp/app/v3/services/registerNextTaskScheduleInstance.server.ts (1)
22-38: LGTM! Great addition of span tracing.The implementation of span tracing with detailed attributes will help track down performance issues in timestamp calculations.
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/timeoutDeployment.server.ts (1)
9-16: LGTM! Performance improvement by usingfindFirstGood change! Using
findFirstinstead offindUniquewhen including relations is more efficient as it avoids an extra uniqueness check, while still returning the same result when querying byid.apps/webapp/app/v3/services/enqueueDelayedRun.server.ts (2)
10-22: LGTM! Performance improvement by usingfindFirstGood change! Using
findFirstinstead offindUniquewhen including relations is more efficient as it avoids an extra uniqueness check, while still returning the same result when querying byid.
40-40: LGTM! Added transaction span for better observabilityGood addition of the transaction span label. This will help track long-running transactions and identify potential bottlenecks.
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/deploymentIndexFailed.server.ts (1)
26-34: LGTM! Consistent use offindFirstGood change! While this query doesn't include relations, using
findFirstmaintains consistency with other database queries and still provides the same result when querying by unique identifiers (idorfriendlyId).apps/webapp/app/routes/api.v1.deployments.$deploymentId.ts (1)
30-42: LGTM! Significant performance improvement for deeply nested relationsExcellent change! Using
findFirstinstead offindUniqueis particularly beneficial here due to the deeply nested relations (worker.tasks). This avoids expensive uniqueness checks while maintaining the same result when querying by the composite key (friendlyId + environmentId).apps/webapp/app/routes/api.v1.projects.$projectRef.ts (1)
30-46: Verify index coverage for the complex query.The switch to
findFirstmight impact query performance, especially with the complex where conditions and included relations. Let's verify the index coverage.apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/performDeploymentAlerts.server.ts (1)
48-48: LGTM! Good addition of the transaction label.The descriptive transaction label "create and send deploy alert" improves tracing capabilities.
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/performTaskAttemptAlerts.server.ts (2)
16-23: LGTM! The change fromfindUniquetofindFirstis safe here.Since we're querying by
idwhich is unique, this change aligns with the PR's efficiency improvements without risking data integrity.
49-49: Great addition of the transaction label!The descriptive label "create and send attempt alert" will help in tracking long-running transactions.
apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/NewAlertChannelPresenter.server.ts (1)
11-15: LGTM! Safe transition tofindFirstOrThrow.The change maintains the same behavior since we're querying by
idwhich is unique.apps/webapp/app/v3/services/cancelDevSessionRuns.server.ts (1)
72-77: LGTM! Safe transition tofindFirst.Both queries use unique identifiers (
friendlyIdandid), making this change safe while improving database efficiency.apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/RunStreamPresenter.server.ts (1)
24-31: Consider usingfindUniquefor querying byfriendlyId.If
friendlyIdis a unique field in the TaskRun model (which it appears to be), usingfindUniquewould be more appropriate and potentially more efficient as it can utilize unique indexes.Let's verify the schema:
✅ Verification successful
Switch to
findUniquefor querying by friendlyId
The Prisma schema confirms thatfriendlyIdis declared as a unique field in the TaskRun model (internal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma), so usingfindUniquewill be both semantically correct and more efficient.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if friendlyId is a unique field in TaskRun model # Test: Search for unique constraint on friendlyId in the Prisma schema # Expected: Find unique constraint for friendlyId rg -A 5 'model TaskRun' | rg -A 10 'friendlyId.*@unique'Length of output: 1280
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/cancelAttempt.server.ts (2)
52-52: LGTM! Good addition of the transaction label.Adding the descriptive label "cancel attempt" improves observability and helps in tracking long-running transactions, which aligns with the PR objectives.
31-38: Consider usingfindUniquefor TaskRunAttempt queries.Both queries use
friendlyIdwhich appears to be a unique identifier. If this field has a unique constraint, usingfindUniquewould be more appropriate.Let's verify the schema:
Also applies to: 96-108
✅ Verification successful
Action: Replace
findFirstwithfindUniquefor TaskRunAttempt queriesThe Prisma schema confirms that the
friendlyIdfield in the TaskRunAttempt model is marked as unique. You should update both query instances (lines 31-38 and 96-108) inapps/webapp/app/v3/services/cancelAttempt.server.tsto usefindUniquefor clarity and efficiency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if friendlyId is a unique field in TaskRunAttempt model # Test: Search for unique constraint on friendlyId in the Prisma schema # Expected: Find unique constraint for friendlyId rg -A 5 'model TaskRunAttempt' | rg -A 10 'friendlyId.*@unique'Length of output: 190
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createDeploymentBackgroundWorker.server.ts (1)
23-27: Consider usingfindUniquefor WorkerDeployment query.The query uses
friendlyIdwhich appears to be a unique identifier. If this field has a unique constraint, usingfindUniquewould be more appropriate.Let's verify the schema:
✅ Verification successful
Update Query in WorkerDeployment Service
The review comment is valid. The
friendlyIdfield in theWorkerDeploymentmodel is marked as@uniquein the Prisma schema (seeinternal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma). This confirms that usingfindUniqueis more appropriate thanfindFirst.
- File:
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createDeploymentBackgroundWorker.server.ts(Lines 23-27)- Action: Replace
findFirstwithfindUniquefor querying byfriendlyId.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if friendlyId is a unique field in WorkerDeployment model # Test: Search for unique constraint on friendlyId in the Prisma schema # Expected: Find unique constraint for friendlyId rg -A 5 'model WorkerDeployment' | rg -A 10 'friendlyId.*@unique'Length of output: 638
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/bulk/performBulkAction.server.ts (2)
96-101: LGTM! Change aligns with DB efficiency improvements.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstwhen including relations is consistent with the PR's objective to improve database efficiency.Let's verify the uniqueness constraints are in place:
✅ Verification successful
Unique constraint verified in Prisma schema.
The Prisma schema located at
internal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prismaconfirms the unique constraint on theidfield of theBulkActionGroupmodel with the declarationid String @id @default(cuid()). This verifies the related changes and aligns with the intended DB efficiency improvements.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if unique constraints exist for bulkActionGroup.id # Expected: Should find a unique constraint on the id field ast-grep --pattern 'model BulkActionGroup { $$$ id String @id $$$ $$$ }'Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the BulkActionGroup model definition and check for the unique id declaration in Prisma schema files rg "model BulkActionGroup" -A 50 -- "*.prisma" | grep -E "id\s+\S+\s+@id" || echo "Unique constraint not found in BulkActionGroup model"Length of output: 239
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the BulkActionGroup model definition and check for the unique id declaration across all files, # excluding common build folders. rg "model BulkActionGroup" -A 30 --glob "!.git" --glob "!node_modules" --glob "!dist" | grep -E "id\s+String\s+@id" || echo "Unique constraint not found in BulkActionGroup model"Length of output: 198
10-17: LGTM! Change aligns with DB efficiency improvements.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstwhen including relations is consistent with the PR's objective to improve database efficiency.Let's verify the uniqueness constraints are in place:
✅ Verification successful
Unique Constraint Confirmed on BulkActionItem.id
The Prisma schema in
./internal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prismashows that theBulkActionItemmodel’sidfield is defined with the@idattribute (and a@default(cuid())). This confirms the uniqueness constraint is in place, validating the switch fromfindUniquetofindFirstwith relation inclusions for the intended DB efficiency improvements.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if unique constraints exist for bulkActionItem.id # Expected: Should find a unique constraint on the id field ast-grep --pattern 'model BulkActionItem { $$$ id String @id $$$ $$$ }'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Re-check the BulkActionItem model for an id field with a unique constraint # using a more flexible pattern to account for potential variations (e.g., default values). ast-grep --pattern 'model BulkActionItem { $$$ id $_ @id $$$ $$$ }'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the Prisma schema file containing the BulkActionItem model and display its context including the id field and its constraints. FILE=$(rg -l "model BulkActionItem" -n . | head -n 1) if [ -f "$FILE" ]; then echo "Found schema file: $FILE" rg -C 5 "model BulkActionItem" "$FILE" else echo "BulkActionItem model not found in the repository." fiLength of output: 645
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/indexDeployment.server.ts (1)
11-18: LGTM! Change aligns with DB efficiency improvements.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstwhen including relations is consistent with the PR's objective to improve database efficiency. The error handling for null results is properly maintained.Let's verify the uniqueness constraints are in place:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Unique Constraint Confirmed
- The Prisma schema in
internal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prismashows theWorkerDeploymentmodel with the lineid String @id @default(cuid()), confirming the unique constraint on theidfield.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if unique constraints exist for workerDeployment.id # Expected: Should find a unique constraint on the id field ast-grep --pattern 'model WorkerDeployment { $$$ id String @id $$$ $$$ }'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # New verification: Search for the WorkerDeployment model definition in our Prisma schema files # to confirm that the "id" field has the unique constraint (@id). rg "model\s+WorkerDeployment" --context 20Length of output: 6335
apps/webapp/app/presenters/v3/EnvironmentVariablesPresenter.server.ts (1)
18-32: LGTM! Change aligns with DB efficiency improvements.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstwith complex relations is consistent with the PR's objective to improve database efficiency. The error handling is well-maintained with a clear error message.Let's verify the uniqueness constraints are in place:
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/restoreCheckpoint.server.ts (1)
16-44: LGTM! Change aligns with DB efficiency improvements.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstwith deeply nested relations is consistent with the PR's objective to improve database efficiency. The extensive error handling for various scenarios is properly maintained.Let's verify the uniqueness constraints are in place:
✅ Verification successful
I'll run a new script using
rgto extract the full block for theCheckpointRestoreEventmodel and check for the unique constraint on theidfield.
Verification confirmed: The unique constraint on
CheckpointRestoreEvent.idis present.
- The Prisma schema (
internal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma) defines theCheckpointRestoreEventmodel withid String @id @default(cuid()), ensuring uniqueness.- The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstaligns with the database efficiency improvements, as the unique constraint onidremains valid.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if unique constraints exist for checkpointRestoreEvent.id # Expected: Should find a unique constraint on the id field ast-grep --pattern 'model CheckpointRestoreEvent { $$$ id String @id $$$ $$$ }'Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the full model block for CheckpointRestoreEvent with context to verify the unique constraint on the id field (id String @id) rg -Pzo "model\\s+CheckpointRestoreEvent\\s*\\{(.*?)\\}" . | tr '\0' '\n'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Attempt to locate the Prisma schema file and extract the model block for CheckpointRestoreEvent FILE=$(fd -HI "schema.prisma" | head -n 1) if [ -z "$FILE" ]; then echo "schema.prisma not found. Searching entire repository for model CheckpointRestoreEvent block..." rg -N "model CheckpointRestoreEvent" -A 100 . else echo "Found schema file: $FILE" echo "Extracting model definition for CheckpointRestoreEvent (showing up to 100 lines following the declaration)..." awk '/model CheckpointRestoreEvent {/,/}/' "$FILE" fiLength of output: 1646
apps/webapp/app/v3/requeueTaskRun.server.ts (1)
14-34: Verify uniqueness of task run IDs.The change from
findUniquetofindFirstassumes task run IDs are unique. Please ensure there's a unique constraint in the schema to prevent duplicate task runs.Run the following script to verify the schema constraint:
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/triggerScheduledTask.server.ts (1)
15-29: Verify uniqueness of task schedule instance IDs.The change from
findUniquetofindFirstassumes task schedule instance IDs are unique. Please ensure there's a unique constraint in the schema to prevent duplicate instances.Run the following script to verify the schema constraint:
✅ Verification successful
Let's perform additional checks by re-inspecting the Prisma schema to verify that the task schedule instance ID is enforced as unique. We'll run two scripts: one to display the full definition of the
TaskScheduleInstancemodel (to manually inspect the unique or primary key constraints) and another to specifically search for anidfield annotated with@id(which implies uniqueness).
TaskScheduleInstance Uniqueness Verified
The schema clearly defines theidfield as the primary key with@id @default(cuid()), ensuring that each task schedule instance is unique. No changes are necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unique constraint on taskScheduleInstance table. # Expect: A unique constraint on id. ast-grep --pattern $'model TaskScheduleInstance { $$$ @@unique([$_]) $$$ }'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Script 1: Display the full definition of the TaskScheduleInstance model with context. # This should help confirm how the unique constraint is implemented. rg "model TaskScheduleInstance" -C 20 --glob "*.prisma" || trueLength of output: 3054
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Script 2: Check if the TaskScheduleInstance model has an 'id' field using the @id attribute. # The presence of @id indicates that the field is a primary key and therefore unique. ast-grep --pattern $'model TaskScheduleInstance { $$$ id $_ @id $$$ }' || trueLength of output: 71
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createTaskRunAttempt.server.ts (2)
133-133: LGTM! Improved transaction tracing.Adding the descriptive label "create attempt" to the transaction improves observability and makes it easier to track long-running transactions.
47-84: Verify uniqueness of task run lookup.The change from
findUniquetofindFirstassumes task run IDs and friendly IDs are unique within an environment. Please ensure there's a unique constraint in the schema to prevent duplicates.Run the following script to verify the schema constraint:
✅ Verification successful
I'm generating an additional shell script to inspect the Prisma schema for the TaskRun model definition—including any unique constraints—to manually verify that a unique constraint exists. Please run the script below and share its output:
Task Run Lookup is Backed by Proper Unique Constraints.
The Prisma schema confirms that:
- The task run's
idfield is a primary key, ensuring uniqueness.- The
friendlyIdfield is marked with@unique, so it is unique on its own.- Although the query filters by
runtimeEnvironmentIdas well, the uniqueness is ensured by the individual constraints onidandfriendlyId.No composite unique constraint with
runtimeEnvironmentIdis needed since each field used in the lookup is globally unique.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unique constraint on taskRun table. # Expect: A unique constraint on id, friendlyId, and runtimeEnvironmentId. ast-grep --pattern $'model TaskRun { $$$ @@unique([$_]) $$$ }'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # This script locates Prisma schema files and extracts the TaskRun model definition, # including any @@unique constraints, so we can verify uniqueness. files=$(fd -t f "schema.prisma") if [ -z "$files" ]; then echo "No schema.prisma file found." exit 1 fi for file in $files; do echo "=== File: $file ===" sed -n '/model TaskRun {/,/}/p' "$file" echo "" doneLength of output: 5833
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/upsertTaskSchedule.server.ts (1)
95-142: LGTM! Enhanced transaction observability.The addition of the span name
"UpsertTaskSchedule.upsertNewSchedule"improves transaction tracing, aligning with the PR's objective to implement spans in$transactioncalls.apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createBackgroundWorker.server.ts (1)
30-30: Verify uniqueness constraints for project retrieval.The change from
findUniqueOrThrowtofindFirstOrThrowcould potentially return a different project if multiple projects match the criteria. Ensure that the combination ofexternalRefandenvironments.idmaintains uniqueness.Run the following script to check for potential duplicate projects:
✅ Verification successful
Uniqueness Constraint Verified for Project Retrieval
The schema confirms that the
Projectmodel uses a unique constraint on theexternalReffield (seeexternalRef String @uniquein the Prisma schema). With this constraint, even though the code now usesfindFirstOrThrow, only one project record can ever match theexternalRefcriterion. There is no composite uniqueness on[externalRef, environments.id], but sinceexternalRefis unique by itself, it safeguards against duplicate project retrieval.
- The
Projectmodel ininternal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prismashowsexternalRefmarked as unique.- No composite index on
[externalRef, environments.id]was found, which indicates that relying on theexternalRefuniqueness is intentional.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential duplicate projects that could match the same criteria # Test: Search for unique constraint or index definitions on projects table ast-grep --pattern $'model Project { $$$ @@unique([$_]) $$$ }' # Test: Search for projects with the same externalRef rg -A 5 $'model Project'Length of output: 1937
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/completeAttempt.server.ts (1)
609-618: Verify uniqueness constraints for environment and task run attempt retrieval.The changes from
findUniquetofindFirstcould potentially return unexpected records if multiple entries match the criteria. Ensure that:
- The
idfield maintains uniqueness for runtime environments- The
friendlyIdmaintains uniqueness for task run attemptsRun the following script to check for potential duplicates:
Also applies to: 622-635
✅ Verification successful
Uniqueness constraints verified in Prisma schema.
- The
RuntimeEnvironmentmodel usesidas its primary key, which guarantees uniqueness.- The
TaskRunAttemptmodel has a unique constraint onfriendlyId.The evidence confirms that using
findFirstin these retrievals is safe given that duplication is prevented by the schema definitions.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unique constraints on runtime environments and task run attempts # Test: Search for unique constraint or index definitions ast-grep --pattern $'model RuntimeEnvironment { $$$ @@unique([$_]) $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern $'model TaskRunAttempt { $$$ @@unique([$_]) $$$ }'Length of output: 157
Script:
#!/bin/bash # This script attempts to list all Prisma schema files and then show the model definitions # for RuntimeEnvironment and TaskRunAttempt, so we can verify the uniqueness annotations. echo "Listing all Prisma schema files:" fd -e prisma echo "" echo "Searching for the model RuntimeEnvironment definition and its fields:" rg "model RuntimeEnvironment" -N -A 30 echo "" echo "Searching for the model TaskRunAttempt definition and its fields:" rg "model TaskRunAttempt" -N -A 30Length of output: 8159
apps/webapp/app/v3/environmentVariables/environmentVariablesRepository.server.ts (2)
139-139: LGTM! Improved transaction spans with descriptive labels.The addition of descriptive strings to
$transactioncalls enhances observability by providing better context for tracing and debugging:
- "create env var"
- "edit env var"
- "delete env var"
- "delete env var value"
Also applies to: 283-283, 527-527, 620-620
60-84: Verify uniqueness constraints for project and environment variable retrieval.The changes from
findUniquetofindFirstcould potentially return unexpected records if multiple entries match the criteria. Ensure that:
- The
idfield maintains uniqueness for projects- The combination of
projectIdandkeymaintains uniqueness for environment variablesRun the following script to check for potential duplicates:
Also applies to: 269-277, 291-296
✅ Verification successful
Uniqueness constraints verified in the Prisma schema.
- The Project model uses an
idfield marked as@id(with a defaultcuid()), ensuring its uniqueness.- The EnvironmentVariable model enforces the unique combination of
projectIdandkeyvia@@unique([projectId, key]).Given the schema confirms these constraints, switching from
findUniquetofindFirstdoes not introduce risks of duplicate data retrieval.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for unique constraints on projects and environment variables # Test: Search for unique constraint or index definitions ast-grep --pattern $'model Project { $$$ @@unique([$_]) $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern $'model EnvironmentVariable { $$$ @@unique([$_]) $$$ }'Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, locate the Prisma schema file(s) echo "Searching for files named schema.prisma..." fd schema.prisma # Now, print out the definition blocks for the Project and EnvironmentVariable models, # along with any uniqueness constraints (including @id and @@unique) from the Prisma schema. echo "=== Model Project definition (with uniqueness constraints) ===" rg -U "model Project\s*\{([^}]+)\}" -n . echo "=== Model EnvironmentVariable definition (with uniqueness constraints) ===" rg -U "model EnvironmentVariable\s*\{([^}]+)\}" -n .Length of output: 5489
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/triggerTask.server.ts (1)
177-177: LGTM! Efficient database query changes.The changes from
findUniquetofindFirstare appropriate here as we're looking up records that could potentially have multiple matches, and we only need the first matching record in each case. The where clauses are specific enough to ensure we get the intended records.Also applies to: 214-214, 231-231, 275-275, 323-323
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/batchTriggerV3.server.ts (1)
162-162: LGTM! Improved database operations.The changes enhance the code in two ways:
- Using
findFirstfor dependent attempt retrieval aligns with the more efficient query pattern- Adding the "create batch run" transaction label improves observability for tracking long-running transactions
Also applies to: 459-459
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/alerts/deliverAlert.server.ts (1)
550-570: LGTM! Improved Slack integration lookup.The changes to use
findFirstfor both primary and fallback Slack integration lookups are well-implemented:
- Primary lookup uses specific criteria (integrationId + organizationId)
- Fallback lookup appropriately orders by creation date to get the most recent integration
- Both queries handle potential multiple matches efficiently
internal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma (5)
1586-1586: Index Addition in BackgroundWorker ModelA new index on
runtimeEnvironmentIdhas been added here. This should help optimize queries filtering on this field across worker records. Please verify that the index order aligns with your most common query patterns.
1649-1650: Composite Index in BackgroundWorkerTask ModelThe addition of the composite index on
[runtimeEnvironmentId, projectId]will likely speed up queries that filter by both fields. Ensure that the column order reflects the actual filtering patterns in your database queries for optimal performance.
1918-1919: Indexes Added in TaskRunDependency ModelSeparate indexes on
dependentAttemptIdanddependentBatchRunIdhave been introduced to enhance lookup efficiency for task dependencies. Confirm that these indexes support your frequently executed joins/filters and do not duplicate existing indexes.
2204-2204: Index Addition in BatchTaskRun ModelAn index on
dependentTaskAttemptIdis now present to improve the performance for queries filtering on task attempts associated with batch runs. Verify that this field is a common query predicate and check that the added index yields the expected performance improvements.
2335-2336: Indexes Added in CheckpointRestoreEvent ModelIndexes on both
checkpointIdandrunIdhave been added. These should facilitate faster lookup of checkpoint events and help in correlating runs with their restore events. It is advisable to review the query plans to ensure these indexes are being utilized effectively.
Summary by CodeRabbit