Skip to content

Fix pre-pulling of deployment images onto worker nodes #1660

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

nicktrn
Copy link
Collaborator

@nicktrn nicktrn commented Feb 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced the deployment finalization process to ensure that accurate image references and project details are applied during deployment completion, resulting in improved consistency and reliability.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 4, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 5494503

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.45.0

ESLint couldn't find the config "custom" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct.

The config "custom" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc.js".

If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.

Walkthrough

The changes refactor the FinalizeDeploymentService by simplifying the Prisma update syntax and ensuring that the updated finalizedDeployment object is used consistently. In particular, the code now directly references finalizedDeployment.imageReference for condition checks and employs finalizedDeployment.id and finalizedDeployment.projectId when emitting events. These modifications enhance the clarity and accuracy of the service's deployment finalization process.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/.../finalizeDeployment.server.ts Simplified Prisma update syntax by removing explicit imageReference assignment. Updated condition to use finalizedDeployment.imageReference and modified event emissions to reference finalizedDeployment.id and finalizedDeployment.projectId.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant S as FinalizeDeploymentService
    participant DB as Prisma
    participant E as EventEmitter

    S->>DB: Update deployment with imageReference (using finalizedDeployment)
    DB-->>S: Return finalizedDeployment
    S->>S: Check finalizedDeployment.imageReference
    S->>E: Emit event with finalizedDeployment.id and finalizedDeployment.projectId
Loading

Poem

I'm a happy bunny in the code field,
Hopping through syntax with a fresh yield.
The image now gleams with a simpler grace,
Deployment flows in its rightful place.
With each refined line, my heart skips a beat – ASCII joy with every hop and leap!
🐇💻✨

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42c5f4d and 5494503.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts (2)

65-65: LGTM!

The simplified Prisma update syntax is correct and maintains the same functionality.


106-117: LGTM! Verify event handling.

The changes correctly use the finalized deployment object for the pre-pull event, ensuring accurate image references and deployment identifiers. The addition of shortCode enhances tracking capabilities.

Let's verify that all necessary fields are handled by the event consumers:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! Event payload fields are correctly handled.

  • The emitter in finalizeDeployment.server.ts sends the expected fields (version, imageRef, shortCode, deploymentId, envId, envType, orgId, and projectId).
  • The consumer in packages/core/src/v3/apps/provider.ts properly accesses these fields.
  • The schema in packages/core/src/v3/schemas/messages.ts confirms the payload structure.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that event consumers handle all fields in the PRE_PULL_DEPLOYMENT event.

# Search for PRE_PULL_DEPLOYMENT event handling
rg -A 10 'PRE_PULL_DEPLOYMENT' --type ts

Length of output: 3859

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Feb 4, 2025

@trigger.dev/build

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/@trigger.dev/build@1660

trigger.dev

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev@1660

@trigger.dev/core

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/@trigger.dev/core@1660

@trigger.dev/react-hooks

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/@trigger.dev/react-hooks@1660

@trigger.dev/sdk

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/@trigger.dev/sdk@1660

@trigger.dev/rsc

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/@trigger.dev/rsc@1660

commit: 5494503

@nicktrn nicktrn merged commit 7fa45ad into main Feb 4, 2025
13 checks passed
@nicktrn nicktrn deleted the fix/pre-pull-deployment branch February 4, 2025 10:07
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant