Create AGENTS.md file #2070
Create AGENTS.md file #2070
Conversation
|
WalkthroughA new documentation file, Changes
Poem
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
AGENTS.md (6)
1-2: Consider adding a Table of Contents
A quick TOC under the main header would improve navigation, especially as the document grows. You could auto-generate it with a markdown tool or manually list the major sections: Repository layout, Development setup, Running tests, Coding style, and Additional docs.
3-3: Polish wording for precision
The phrase “make up the Trigger.dev platform and SDK” could be elevated to “comprise the Trigger.dev platform and SDK” to align with technical writing best practices.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~3-~3: Try using a synonym here to elevate your writing.
Context: ...ontains multiple apps and packages that make up the Trigger.dev platform and SDK. ## R...(CONSTITUTE_COMPRISE)
5-13: Clarify workspace paths
For paths likeai/references, consider prefixing them with their root—for example,./ai/references—to reduce ambiguity for new contributors navigating the monorepo.
16-17: Recommend Node version management
You mention Node.js20.11.1is required—consider adding a.nvmrcfile or a note about usingnvmto lock the version, so contributors don’t accidentally run an unsupported Node version.
28-29: Streamline the build step with Turborepo
Rather than chaining threepnpm run build --filtercommands, you could leverage Turbo’s pipeline to build all targets in one go (e.g.,pnpm run build [email protected]/sdk). This reduces boilerplate and speeds up builds.
34-35: Use backticks for URLs
Instead of<http://localhost:3030>, wrap the URL in backticks for consistency with code styling:The webapp runs on `http://localhost:3030`.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
AGENTS.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
AGENTS.md
[style] ~3-~3: Try using a synonym here to elevate your writing.
Context: ...ontains multiple apps and packages that make up the Trigger.dev platform and SDK. ## R...
(CONSTITUTE_COMPRISE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
AGENTS.md (3)
38-55: Tests section is clear—nice work
The guidance on running workspace-specific Vitest suites and avoiding mocks is thorough and actionable.
56-60: Coding style guidelines look good
Prettier enforcement, branching rules, and test naming conventions are all clearly stated.
61-68: Additional docs pointers are helpful
Linking to the rootREADME.mdand thedocsworkspace will smooth the onboarding experience.
Summary by CodeRabbit