-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
Critical Section doc update #298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Critical Section doc update #298
Conversation
@deepikabhavnani Please review my copy edits, and make sure they didn't accidentally change the meaning of anything. |
Make copy edits, mostly for active voice and formatting.
@AnotherButler - Looks good, will try not to repeat same :-) |
Combine and capitalize parts of word because we're talking about the API here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few comments.
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ | |||
## CriticalSectionLock | |||
|
|||
CriticalSectionLock class provides a mechanism to access a resource uniterrupted. With the `lock` API, you can enter critical section with interrupts disabled. The `unlock` API is the exit from critical section, and the state of interrupts is restored upon exit. Nesting of critical section is supported, and interrupts are enabled only when we exit from last nested critical section. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
uninterrupted or without interruption? Anything about RAII usage or scope?
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@ | |||
## CriticalSectionLock | |||
|
|||
CriticalSectionLock class provides a mechanism to access a resource without interruption. With the `lock` API, you can enter critical section with interrupts disabled. The `unlock` API is the exit from critical section, and the state of interrupts is restored upon exit. Nesting of critical section is supported, and interrupts are enabled only when we exit from last nested critical section. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you want to remove mentions the lock
and unlock
since these aren't RAII and may be deprecated?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will keep them in 5.6 version as they are relevant. Hopefully we would deprecate by 5.7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good
Make minor copy edits.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a few comments related to passive voice and clarity. Please review my suggested changes and answer my questions.
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ | |||
## CriticalSectionLock | |||
|
|||
The CriticalSectionLock class provides a mechanism to access a resource without interruption. With the `lock` API, you can enter critical section with interrupts disabled. The `unlock` API is the exit from critical section, and the state of interrupts is restored upon exit. Nesting of critical section is supported, and interrupts are enabled only when we exit from last nested critical section. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Query: Who or what restores the state of interrupts upon exist? Also, who or what enables interrupts only when we exist from the last critical section?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Destructor - restores the state of interrupts/
Destructor
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ | |||
## CriticalSectionLock | |||
|
|||
The CriticalSectionLock class provides a mechanism to access a resource without interruption. With the `lock` API, you can enter critical section with interrupts disabled. The `unlock` API is the exit from critical section, and the state of interrupts is restored upon exit. Nesting of critical section is supported, and interrupts are enabled only when we exit from last nested critical section. | |||
|
|||
CriticalSectionLock class is based on RAII approach. In other words, lock is acquired in constructor and destroyed automatically when out of scope as part of destructor. We do not recommend you use CriticalSectionLock as global or a member of a class because you will enter critical section on object creation, and all interrupts will be disabled. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Query: Who or what acquires lock in the constructor? Also, who or what destroys lock automatically when it's out of scope? Also, who or what disables all interrupts when you use CriticalSectionLock as global or a member of a class?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Constructor acquires the lock. Destructor destroys lock.
Make minor changes from passive to active voice.
@deepikabhavnani Please review my changes and make sure I didn't accidentally change the meaning of anything. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Thanks for changes.
Added an example to demonstrate race condition and usage of critical section api. Also updated the description for API.
https://jira.arm.com/browse/IOTMORF-1286
@AnotherButler @sg- Please review