Reduce 32KB from LPC55S69_S binary size

[mikisch81]

Description

Reduce the LPC55S69_S targets binary size from 192KB to 160KB.

Tested on LPC55S69 target, all PSA and compliance tests pass.

Targeted for rc3.

Pull request type

[X] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

@orenc17 @mmahadevan108

Release Notes

[ciarmcom]

@mikisch81, thank you for your changes.
@orenc17 @maclobdell @MarceloSalazar @ARMmbed/mbed-os-storage @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

[mmahadevan108]

Thank you for your changes, please update the below as well as I could not find a way to include the header file into IAR linker script as is done for GCC_ARM and ARMC toolchains
https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-os/blob/master/targets/TARGET_NXP/TARGET_MCUXpresso_MCUS/TARGET_LPC55S69/TARGET_M33_NS/device/TOOLCHAIN_IAR/LPC55S69_cm33_core0_flash.icf#L26

[mikisch81]

@theotherjimmy @bridadan @deepikabhavnani @orenc17 @alzix
Opened IOTSEC-1123 regarding our on-going discussion on PSA targets addresses.

This PR is an example of the need for it (a small change in the split between secure/non-secure forced us to change couple of files).

[alzix]

Can we use values from JSON file directly instead of hardcoded values?

[mikisch81]

Can we use values from JSON file directly instead of hardcoded values?

It is something which requires more work, can you move the discussion to the new JIRA task?

[mikisch81]

@jenia81 @mottigondabi FYI

[mikisch81]

@orenc17 please review

[0xc0170]

CI started

[orenc17]

rebased on top of master for #10086

[mikisch81]

@0xc0170 can CI be restarted?

[orenc17]

@mikisch81 i think we are going to need a roll-up PR here @davidsaada has conflicts between this PR and #10086 and #10068

[mikisch81]

@orenc17 this PR is ready to be merged, it was only waiting for rc2 to finally happen, no need to hold this because of another PR

[cmonr]

@mikisch81 i think we are going to need a roll-up PR here @davidsaada has conflicts between this PR and #10086 and #10068

Oh boy.

[davidsaada]

No need for a rollup PR. My bootloader PR is dependent on this one and not vice versa. All I needed was either this PR to be merged in or rebased.

[cmonr]

CI started

[mbed-ci]

Test run: FAILED

Summary: 1 of 13 test jobs failed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

Failed test jobs:

• jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_exporter

[mbed-ci]

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 13 of 13 test jobs passed
Build number : 2
Build artifacts