Skip to content

[NUC472] Support no-XRAM configuration #3767

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2017
Merged

Conversation

ccli8
Copy link
Contributor

@ccli8 ccli8 commented Feb 14, 2017

Description

This PR adds support for no-XRAM configuration for the NUMAKER_PFM_NUC472 target. This configuration enables evaluation for products that needn't external SRAM which is attached with the NuMaker-PFM-NUC472 board.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Feb 15, 2017

Do we need separate linker files for each toolchain ? Can't they be the same and use that extra label to add parts that are needed (I did not make any diff to see what's new in this PR if it's just one region or somethign more). Just wondering if there's copy-paste that we could avoid.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Feb 15, 2017

/morph test

@ccli8
Copy link
Contributor Author

ccli8 commented Feb 16, 2017

@0xc0170 To support XRAM/no-XRAM configurations simultaneously, source code can be easily distinguished by extra label without branch, but linker files cannot in the same way. If mbed build tool supports preprocessing of linker files, it would be OK to have just one linker file for each toolchain.

@bridadan
Copy link
Contributor

/morph test

@mbed-bot
Copy link

Result: SUCCESS

Your command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!

/morph test

Output

mbed Build Number: 1621

All builds and test passed!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants