Skip to content

Fix block axis element type in tests #139

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2023

Conversation

jishnub
Copy link
Member

@jishnub jishnub commented May 23, 2023

This should fix the failure seen in JuliaArrays/BlockArrays.jl#260

Perhaps we should test for equality instead of === in this test, since the length is checked in the previous line? This would make the test pass with older versions of BlockArrays as well.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +1.88 🎉

Comparison is base (3ae935a) 78.00% compared to head (ffbc7c3) 79.88%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #139      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.00%   79.88%   +1.88%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1314     1407      +93     
==========================================
+ Hits         1025     1124      +99     
+ Misses        289      283       -6     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@jishnub jishnub requested a review from dlfivefifty May 23, 2023 09:33
@dlfivefifty dlfivefifty merged commit 4240f39 into JuliaLinearAlgebra:master May 23, 2023
@jishnub jishnub deleted the blockaxesfix branch May 23, 2023 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants