Add FEATURES.md documenting Codegen SDK analysis capabilities #4
Conversation
![codegen-sh[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/321279?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Reviewer's GuideThis pull request introduces a new Markdown file, File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡 |
1 similar comment
|
Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡 |
|
I see that your PR for adding FEATURES.md has failed the pre-commit checks. I'll fix the issues and push a commit to your PR branch. Let me analyze the errors first. |
|
I've fixed the formatting issues in FEATURES.md that were causing the pre-commit checks to fail. The changes include:
These were all formatting changes only - the content of your documentation remains intact. The PR should now pass the pre-commit checks. Let me know if you need any other adjustments! 💻 View my work • React 👍 or 👎 |
|
Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡 |
1 similar comment
|
Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡 |
|
I've fixed the failing checks in your PR by updating the numbered list formatting in FEATURES.md. The issue was that the numbered list in the "Integration with Static Analysis Tools" section was using all "1." instead of sequential numbers (1, 2, 3, 4). I've made the following changes:
The PR should now pass all checks. The changes are purely formatting-related and don't affect the content of your documentation. 💻 View my work • React 👍 or 👎 |
|
I've made another fix to the FEATURES.md file to address the remaining formatting issues. The pre-commit checks were failing because:
I've fixed these issues by:
The PR should now pass all checks. I'll keep monitoring the status to make sure everything is resolved. 💻 View my work • React 👍 or 👎 |
|
Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡 |
|
I've fixed the failing checks in your PR by addressing the markdown formatting issues in FEATURES.md. The main issues were:
I've pushed a commit that fixes these formatting issues while preserving all the content of your documentation. The PR should now pass all checks and be ready for review. The changes were minimal and only affected formatting, not the actual content of your comprehensive documentation on Codegen SDK analysis capabilities. 💻 View my work • React 👍 or 👎 |
|
Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡 |
|
I see that the PR check has failed for the "fix end of files" check. I'll fix this issue and push a commit to make the PR pass all checks. |
|
I've received your message and will continue working on fixing the failing check in the PR. I'll keep you updated on my progress. |
|
I've fixed the failing check by addressing the end-of-file newline issues in multiple files:
The changes have been committed and pushed to the PR branch. The CI checks should now pass successfully. The commit message is "Fix end-of-file newlines in multiple files". 💻 View my work • React 👍 or 👎 |
|
Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡 |
|
I've received your interrupt message. I'll pause my current actions and wait for your further instructions. Is there something specific you'd like me to address or a different approach you'd like me to take? |
|
Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡 |
|
I've fixed the failing checks in your PR by addressing the end-of-file newline issues that were causing the pre-commit checks to fail. The main issues were:
I've pushed a commit that fixes these issues while preserving all the content of your documentation. The PR should now pass all checks and be ready for review. The changes were minimal and only affected formatting, not the actual content of your comprehensive documentation on Codegen SDK analysis capabilities. 💻 View my work • React 👍 or 👎 |
|
Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡 |
|
Uh oh! I hit an error while processing your request. 😓 Our team has been notified and will look into this issue. 🙇 If you need immediate assistance, please reach out in our |
|
Uh oh! I hit an error while processing your request. 😓 Our team has been notified and will look into this issue. 🙇 If you need immediate assistance, please reach out in our |
1 similar comment
|
Uh oh! I hit an error while processing your request. 😓 Our team has been notified and will look into this issue. 🙇 If you need immediate assistance, please reach out in our |
…1133) This PR updates the Slack integration documentation to address feedback from Slack marketplace reviewers and ensure compliance with their requirements. ## Changes Made ### ✅ Privacy Policy Link (Feedback #4) - Added prominent link to https://www.codegen.com/privacy-policy in the Data Privacy and Security section ### ✅ AI Disclaimer (Feedback #5) - Added comprehensive "AI Components and Usage" section explaining: - AI-powered functionality and capabilities - How AI processes data from Slack messages - AI limitations and recommendations for code review ### ✅ Pricing Information (Feedback #8) - Added "Pricing and Plans" section with link to https://www.codegen.com/pricing - Explains that Slack integration is available across all plan tiers ### ✅ Enhanced Permissions Documentation (Feedback #7) - Restructured permissions section with detailed explanations - Added specific scope clarifications: - `mpim:read` - For group DM functionality - `chat:write.customize` - For custom usernames/avatars when representing different contexts - `users:read.email` - For mapping Slack accounts to Codegen accounts for proper authentication - Explained why each permission is necessary ### ✅ Privacy Enhancements (Feedback #2) - Clarified that private channel names are anonymized as "Private channel" for non-members - Enhanced privacy metadata handling explanation ## Slack Marketplace Feedback Addressed This PR directly addresses the following feedback items from Slack reviewers: - **#2**: Privacy model compliance - private channel name anonymization - **#4**: Privacy policy link requirement - **#5**: AI disclaimer requirement for AI-enabled apps - **#7**: Scope usage clarification for `chat:write.customize` and `users:read.email` - **#8**: Pricing information requirement ## Remaining Technical Issues The following items require code changes (not documentation) and are outside the scope of this PR: - **#1**: Missing `mpim:read` scope in OAuth URL (technical implementation) - **#3**: OAuth state parameter uniqueness (technical implementation) - **#6**: Group DM response issue related to missing `mpim:read` scope (technical implementation) ## Files Changed - `docs/integrations/slack.mdx` - Updated with all compliance requirements --- [💻 View my work](https://codegen.sh/agent/trace/35953) • [About Codegen](https://codegen.com) --------- Co-authored-by: codegen-sh[bot] <131295404+codegen-sh[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds a comprehensive FEATURES.md file that documents all the analysis capabilities available in the Codegen SDK. The document is organized into the following sections:
This documentation will help users understand the full range of analysis capabilities available in the SDK and how to use them effectively.
The content is based on a thorough examination of the codebase, particularly the analysis functions in the SDK and examples.
💻 View my work • About Codegen
Summary by Sourcery
Add comprehensive documentation for Codegen SDK analysis capabilities in a new FEATURES.md file
New Features:
Documentation: