Skip to content

Add comprehensive documentation of SDK analysis features #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

codegen-sh[bot]
Copy link

@codegen-sh codegen-sh bot commented Apr 29, 2025

This PR adds comprehensive documentation of the Codegen SDK's analysis capabilities:

FEATURES.md

A detailed documentation of all the analysis capabilities available in the Codegen SDK, organized into the following sections:

  1. Core Analysis Functions - Lists the main analysis functions like:

    • calculate_cyclomatic_complexity
    • cc_rank
    • get_operators_and_operands
    • calculate_halstead_volume
    • count_lines
    • calculate_maintainability_index
  2. Analysis Categories - Provides a detailed breakdown of analysis capabilities by category:

    • Codebase Structure Analysis (file statistics, symbol tree analysis, etc.)
    • Symbol-Level Analysis (function analysis, class analysis, etc.)
    • Dependency and Flow Analysis (call graphs, data flow, etc.)
    • Code Quality Analysis (unused code detection, complexity metrics, etc.)
    • Visualization Capabilities (dependency graphs, call graphs, etc.)
    • Language-Specific Analysis (Python and TypeScript specific features)
  3. Usage Examples - Shows how to use the SDK for various analysis tasks

  4. Integration with Static Analysis Tools - Explains how to integrate the SDK with other tools

ANALYSIS_VIEW_MOCKUP.md

A visual mockup of how the analysis results would be presented when using the Codegen SDK, including:

  1. Command Line Interface View - How results appear in the terminal
  2. Web Interface View - Dashboard, visualizations, and detailed views
  3. API Response Format - JSON structure for programmatic access

This documentation will help users understand the full capabilities of the Codegen SDK for code analysis and how to leverage these features in their projects.


💻 View my workAbout Codegen

Summary by Sourcery

Add comprehensive documentation for Codegen SDK's analysis capabilities, including detailed feature descriptions, usage examples, and mockup visualizations

New Features:

  • Documented core analysis functions for code complexity and metrics
  • Detailed analysis categories including codebase structure, symbol-level, and dependency analysis
  • Provided language-specific analysis capabilities for Python and TypeScript

Documentation:

  • Created FEATURES.md with a comprehensive overview of SDK analysis capabilities
  • Added ANALYSIS_VIEW_MOCKUP.md to demonstrate analysis result presentation formats

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This pull request adds comprehensive documentation for the Codegen SDK analysis features by creating two new Markdown files: FEATURES.md detailing the capabilities and ANALYSIS_VIEW_MOCKUP.md providing output examples.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added detailed documentation of SDK analysis features, functions, and usage.
  • Listed core analysis functions (e.g., calculate_cyclomatic_complexity).
  • Categorized analysis types (structure, symbol, dependency, quality).
  • Provided usage examples and integration details.
FEATURES.md
Added mockups illustrating analysis result presentation.
  • Included CLI output example.
  • Included Web UI mockups (dashboard, visualizations).
  • Included API JSON response format example.
ANALYSIS_VIEW_MOCKUP.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Apr 29, 2025

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Author

codegen-sh bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡

💻 View my work

1 similar comment
Copy link
Author

codegen-sh bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡

💻 View my work

Copy link
Author

codegen-sh bot commented Apr 29, 2025

I've fixed the failing check in your PR! 🛠️

The issue was that the markdown files needed to be formatted according to the project's mdformat standards. I've made the following changes:

  1. Reformatted both FEATURES.md and ANALYSIS_VIEW_MOCKUP.md to comply with the project's markdown formatting rules
  2. Committed and pushed the changes to your PR branch

The CI checks should now pass. The content of the documentation remains the same, but the formatting has been adjusted to meet the project's standards.

Let me know if you need any other assistance with this PR!

💻 View my work • React 👍 or 👎

Copy link
Author

codegen-sh bot commented Apr 29, 2025

Hey! 👋 I see one of the checks failed. I am on it! 🫡

💻 View my work

Copy link
Author

codegen-sh bot commented Apr 29, 2025

I've received your interrupt message. I'm currently examining the PR and the failing check suite to identify and fix the issue. I'll keep you updated on my progress.

💻 View my work

Copy link
Author

codegen-sh bot commented Apr 29, 2025

I've received your second interrupt message. I'm currently setting up the environment to examine the failing tests. I'll continue working on fixing the issue and will keep you updated.

💻 View my work

Copy link
Author

codegen-sh bot commented Apr 29, 2025

I've fixed the failing check suite in PR #5. The issue was related to markdown formatting that didn't comply with the project's mdformat standards.

Changes made:

  1. Fixed list numbering in FEATURES.md (changed from 2, 3, 4, 5 to all 1's for automatic numbering)
  2. Removed trailing newlines at the end of both markdown files

These changes should resolve the failing pre-commit checks. The PR should now pass all checks and be ready for review.

Would you like me to explain any other aspects of the fix?

💻 View my work • React 👍 or 👎

@Zeeeepa Zeeeepa force-pushed the develop branch 11 times, most recently from 27f0eca to f4656a2 Compare May 8, 2025 04:25
@codegen-sh codegen-sh bot closed this May 8, 2025
Zeeeepa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2025
…1133)

This PR updates the Slack integration documentation to address feedback
from Slack marketplace reviewers and ensure compliance with their
requirements.

## Changes Made

### ✅ Privacy Policy Link (Feedback #4)
- Added prominent link to https://www.codegen.com/privacy-policy in the
Data Privacy and Security section

### ✅ AI Disclaimer (Feedback #5) 
- Added comprehensive "AI Components and Usage" section explaining:
  - AI-powered functionality and capabilities
  - How AI processes data from Slack messages
  - AI limitations and recommendations for code review

### ✅ Pricing Information (Feedback #8)
- Added "Pricing and Plans" section with link to
https://www.codegen.com/pricing
- Explains that Slack integration is available across all plan tiers

### ✅ Enhanced Permissions Documentation (Feedback #7)
- Restructured permissions section with detailed explanations
- Added specific scope clarifications:
  - `mpim:read` - For group DM functionality
- `chat:write.customize` - For custom usernames/avatars when
representing different contexts
- `users:read.email` - For mapping Slack accounts to Codegen accounts
for proper authentication
- Explained why each permission is necessary

### ✅ Privacy Enhancements (Feedback #2)
- Clarified that private channel names are anonymized as "Private
channel" for non-members
- Enhanced privacy metadata handling explanation

## Slack Marketplace Feedback Addressed

This PR directly addresses the following feedback items from Slack
reviewers:
- **#2**: Privacy model compliance - private channel name anonymization
- **#4**: Privacy policy link requirement  
- **#5**: AI disclaimer requirement for AI-enabled apps
- **#7**: Scope usage clarification for `chat:write.customize` and
`users:read.email`
- **#8**: Pricing information requirement

## Remaining Technical Issues

The following items require code changes (not documentation) and are
outside the scope of this PR:
- **#1**: Missing `mpim:read` scope in OAuth URL (technical
implementation)
- **#3**: OAuth state parameter uniqueness (technical implementation) 
- **#6**: Group DM response issue related to missing `mpim:read` scope
(technical implementation)

## Files Changed
- `docs/integrations/slack.mdx` - Updated with all compliance
requirements

---

[💻 View my work](https://codegen.sh/agent/trace/35953) • [About
Codegen](https://codegen.com)

---------

Co-authored-by: codegen-sh[bot] <131295404+codegen-sh[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants