Skip to content

chore(e2e): break up E2eMaterialModules #15633

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 28, 2019
Merged

chore(e2e): break up E2eMaterialModules #15633

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 28, 2019

Conversation

mmalerba
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mmalerba mmalerba added P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround pr: merge safe target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Mar 27, 2019
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Mar 27, 2019
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you expand the commit message to explain the background for this change?

</div>
`,
styles: [`
.label {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we prefix these classes with e2e-?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I copied this from Andrew's example viewer in the dev-app, it looks like we don't need any of the styles for the e2e app so I removed them

import {createCustomElement} from '@angular/elements';
import {EXAMPLE_COMPONENTS} from '@angular/material-examples';

@Component({
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add JsDoc description?

This change brings the e2e app more inline with the dev-app by removing
the "MaterialModules" anti-pattern. This will allow us to add lazy
loading to the e2e app in a future PR.
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Mar 28, 2019
@ngbot
Copy link

ngbot bot commented Mar 28, 2019

I see that you just added the pr: merge ready label, but the following checks are still failing:
    failure status "branch-manager" is failing

If you want your PR to be merged, it has to pass all the CI checks.

If you can't get the PR to a green state due to flakes or broken master, please try rebasing to master and/or restarting the CI job. If that fails and you believe that the issue is not due to your change, please contact the caretaker and ask for help.

@jelbourn jelbourn merged commit e91ceaf into angular:master Mar 28, 2019
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants