Skip to content

Add REST-JSON Content-Type tests #2756

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

dagnir
Copy link
Contributor

@dagnir dagnir commented Oct 7, 2021

Motivation and Context

REST-JSON content-type handling fixes.

Description

Add SDK standard test cases that verify correct conte-type handling for the
REST-JSON protocol.

Testing

N/A, these are tests.

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have read the README document
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • A short description of the change has been added to the CHANGELOG
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

Add SDK standard test cases that verify correct conte-type handling for the
REST-JSON protocol.
@dagnir
Copy link
Contributor Author

dagnir commented Oct 7, 2021

protocol-tests is expected to fail tests since we need to make changes to comply with the standard behavior.

@joviegas
Copy link
Contributor

joviegas commented Oct 7, 2021

Do we need test cases for "action": "unmarshall" ?

@dagnir
Copy link
Contributor Author

dagnir commented Oct 7, 2021

Do we need test cases for "action": "unmarshall" ?

No, the changes are for correct content-type on on rest-json requests. The SDK doesn't really even care about the content-type on responses.

@dagnir dagnir merged commit 0c0f39e into aws:dongie/rest-json-updates Oct 7, 2021
@dagnir dagnir deleted the rest-json-protocol-test branch October 7, 2021 17:21
dagnir added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2021
* Add REST-JSON Content-Type tests (#2756)

Add SDK standard test cases that verify correct conte-type handling for the
REST-JSON protocol.

* Follow standard REST-JSON content-type handling (#2765)

* Follow standard REST-JSON content-type handling

Update the REST-JSON marshalling logic to conform to the standard expected
behavior WRT to the `Content-Type` of the request.

* Add additional protocol test

Verifies that when there are unbound members (no `location` trait), and they are
null, that we continue to marshall to an empty JSON object in the body.

* Extract block to method

* Don't create object if no implicit members (#2773)

This fixes an edge case in the REST-JSON marshaller: if the request has neither
an explicit payload nor implicit payload members (i.e. members not explicitly
bound to an location), then the marshaller should not create an create an
object. i.e. the request body should be "", and not "{}".
dagnir added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2021
* Add REST-JSON Content-Type tests (#2756)

Add SDK standard test cases that verify correct conte-type handling for the
REST-JSON protocol.

* Follow standard REST-JSON content-type handling (#2765)

* Follow standard REST-JSON content-type handling

Update the REST-JSON marshalling logic to conform to the standard expected
behavior WRT to the `Content-Type` of the request.

* Add additional protocol test

Verifies that when there are unbound members (no `location` trait), and they are
null, that we continue to marshall to an empty JSON object in the body.

* Extract block to method

* Don't create object if no implicit members (#2773)

This fixes an edge case in the REST-JSON marshaller: if the request has neither
an explicit payload nor implicit payload members (i.e. members not explicitly
bound to an location), then the marshaller should not create an create an
object. i.e. the request body should be "", and not "{}".

* Fix rest-json marshalling for events (#2805)

Correctly propagate the existence of implicit event members down to the
marshaller.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants