Skip to content

Firestore: Remove obsolete special case from tests when verifying "missing index" error message in non-default DB #7927

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dconeybe
Copy link
Contributor

@dconeybe dconeybe commented Jan 8, 2024

This PR removes a special case from the integration tests (#7874) that verifies the "missing index" error message returned from the server. Previously, a non-default database would result in a different, less descriptive error message; however, the backend was updated to use the same, descriptive error message for both default and non-default databases. The tests, therefore, should have to the special case removed to increase the coverage of the tests.

Googlers see b/316359394 for more information.

…ssing index" error message from the backend.
@dconeybe dconeybe self-assigned this Jan 8, 2024
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 8, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 86bea3c

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants