Skip to content

Firestore: add TODO comments about removing special 'missing index' test logic for multidb #7874

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 14, 2023

Conversation

dconeybe
Copy link
Contributor

@dconeybe dconeybe commented Dec 14, 2023

Add a comment to Firestore's integration tests about removing special logic when testing for the "missing index" error message. Formerly, the "missing index" error message was different for the default database and a non-default database; however, their logic has been unified, and will be rolled out to production soon. Once rolled out, these tests should be updated to remove the special logic for non-default dbs.

A similar change was made to the android sdk in firebase/firebase-android-sdk#5600.

Googlers see b/316359394 for details.

@dconeybe dconeybe self-assigned this Dec 14, 2023
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 14, 2023

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 6007df5

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dconeybe dconeybe changed the title Dconeybe/add comment about bug316359394 Firestore: add TODO comments about removing special 'missing index' test logic for multidb Dec 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

Changeset File Check ⚠️

  • Warning: This PR modifies files in the following packages but they have not been included in the changeset file:%0A - @firebase/firestore%0A%0A Make sure this was intentional.

@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@dconeybe dconeybe marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2023 20:51
@dconeybe dconeybe requested review from a team as code owners December 14, 2023 20:51
@dconeybe dconeybe requested a review from milaGGL December 14, 2023 20:52
Copy link
Contributor

@milaGGL milaGGL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
---
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changeset is empty.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was intentional. There is no changeset needed and GitHub complained that there was no changeset, suggesting to create an empty changeset if no change log entry was needed. Maybe I misunderstood that message. I'll verify.

@dconeybe dconeybe merged commit 50b2182 into master Dec 14, 2023
@dconeybe dconeybe deleted the dconeybe/AddCommentAboutBug316359394 branch December 14, 2023 21:17
@firebase firebase locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 14, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants