Skip to content

[SYCL] Add E2E test for -foffload-fp32-prec-div/sqrt #17037

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

[SYCL] Add E2E test for -foffload-fp32-prec-div/sqrt #17037

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor

@MrSidims MrSidims commented Feb 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Supporting doc: #17033

@MrSidims
remove sycl.hpp
65049e6 
Signed-off-by: Sidorov, Dmitry <[email protected]>
@MrSidims MrSidims marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2025 15:34
@MrSidims MrSidims requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2025 15:34
@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor Author

@intel/llvm-reviewers-runtime please take a look

aelovikov-intel
aelovikov-intel reviewed Feb 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
@MrSidims
simplify
20068a6 
Signed-off-by: Sidorov, Dmitry <[email protected]>
@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor Author

CUDA results:
Failed Tests (1):
SYCL :: DeviceLib/built-ins/offload-prec-div-sqrt.cpp

guess I first need this patch to be merged #17044

aelovikov-intel
aelovikov-intel reviewed Feb 19, 2025
View reviewed changes
aelovikov-intel
aelovikov-intel reviewed Feb 19, 2025
View reviewed changes
cperkinsintel
cperkinsintel reviewed Feb 19, 2025
View reviewed changes
@MrSidims
apply suggestions
8cd6672 
Signed-off-by: Sidorov, Dmitry <[email protected]>
@MrSidims
std->sycl
7761947 
Signed-off-by: Sidorov, Dmitry <[email protected]>
@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor Author

HIP and BMG failures are unrelated

aelovikov-intel
aelovikov-intel approved these changes Feb 20, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still don't like the naming of the helper. IMO, just inlining == would be better, but I can live with the current version.

@MrSidims
apply suggestion
d5b8823 
Signed-off-by: Sidorov, Dmitry <[email protected]>
@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor Author

MrSidims commented Feb 20, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I still don't like the naming of the helper. IMO, just inlining == would be better, but I can live with the current version.

Well, inlining into the assert imho looks quite unpleasant (at least in my IDE), but I can get rid of the function without any regret.

@MrSidims MrSidims requested a review from a team February 25, 2025 20:34
@MrSidims
Copy link
Contributor Author

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please help with the merge

@sarnex sarnex merged commit 9164df1 into intel:sycl Feb 25, 2025
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@cperkinsintel cperkinsintel cperkinsintel approved these changes

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@MrSidims @cperkinsintel @aelovikov-intel @sarnex