-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 787
[SYCL] piDeviceRelease resource leak fix #2668
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
cperkinsintel
wants to merge
1
commit into
intel:sycl
from
cperkinsintel:cperkins-device-resource-leak
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's not very clear what should be done if a platform is released before a device bound to this platform.
Can we do vice versa - device has a shared_ptr to platform, platform has a weak_ptr to device?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can try it.
The platform has multiple owners "higher up", like the context and the GlobalHandler. So it isn't affected if the device has a weak_ptr to it. But I'm less certain for the devices. I think the platform might be the primary owner, so if it's a weak pointer, then the device might be released before the platform is done with it. Also, the code has a clear chain of ownership now: context->platform->device, it seems unwise to meddle with it.
I would prefer that instead of returning just platform() in the else case, that we throw an exception - because no one should be asking for the platform after it has been released. However, that would be an ABI change, and I wanted to avoid anything controversial.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed this PR to draft, and opened a new one here: #2671