[SYCL] Release specialization constant buffer

[HabKaffee]

This patch releases spec const buffer implementation.
Tests is placed to llvm-test-suite.
link to PR in llvm-test-suite: intel/llvm-test-suite#643

[HabKaffee]

/summary:run

[HabKaffee]

/summary:run

[HabKaffee]

SYCL / Default Linux / HIP AMD GPU Test Suite (pull_request) fails because it can't find xptifw_lib ( NameError: name 'xptifw_lib' is not defined https://github.com/intel/llvm/runs/4604953955?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:1503)

[bader]

SYCL / Default Linux / HIP AMD GPU Test Suite (pull_request) fails because it can't find xptifw_lib ( NameError: name 'xptifw_lib' is not defined https://github.com/intel/llvm/runs/4604953955?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:1503)

Should be fixed by intel/llvm-test-suite#655. Please, re-run the job.

[HabKaffee]

I re-ran jobs.

[HabKaffee]

@bader What should I do if SYCL / Default Linux / HIP AMD GPU Test Suite (pull_request) fails because of SYCL :: GroupAlgorithm/SYCL2020/sort.cpp, but my patch is not affect it at all?

[bader]

@bader What should I do if SYCL / Default Linux / HIP AMD GPU Test Suite (pull_request) fails because of SYCL :: GroupAlgorithm/SYCL2020/sort.cpp, but my patch is not affect it at all?

It looks like tested compiler doesn't include 9abe201. I assume it's because re-run took the old version of the sycl branch. I suggest merging tip of the sycl branch to your private branch. This should trigger new pre-commit, which will test updated compiler.

@alexbatashev, FYI.

[HabKaffee]

@bader What should I do if SYCL / Default Linux / HIP AMD GPU Test Suite (pull_request) fails because of SYCL :: GroupAlgorithm/SYCL2020/sort.cpp, but my patch is not affect it at all?

It looks like tested compiler doesn't include 9abe201. I assume it's because re-run took the old version of the sycl branch. I suggest merging tip of the sycl branch to your private branch. This should trigger new pre-commit, which will test updated compiler.

@alexbatashev, FYI.

Ok, I'll merge 9abe201 and try again

[bader]

I suggest you merge HEAD of the sycl branch to test compatibility with other commits.

[HabKaffee]

I suggest you merge HEAD of the sycl branch to test compatibility with other commits.

Got it.

[HabKaffee]

/summary:run

[bader]

/verify with intel/llvm-test-suite#643

[HabKaffee]

Failure in SYCL / Default Linux / OCL x64 Test Suite (pull_request) (logs) is not associated with this PR

[HabKaffee]

Failure in SYCL / Default Linux / OCL x64 Test Suite (pull_request) (logs) is not associated with this PR

Update: new logs

[bader]

/verify with intel/llvm-test-suite#643

I see a lot of failures in the logs. Most of them are already reported and handled, but I see a few new issues:

Linux_LLVM-Test-Suite_CUDA_FAILURE.log

[2021-12-22T16:18:05.327Z] ********************
[2021-12-22T16:18:05.327Z] Unexpectedly Passed Tests (1):
[2021-12-22T16:18:05.327Z] LLVM :: DeviceLib/built-ins/nan.cpp

Windows_LLVM-Test-Suite_FAILURE.log

[2021-12-22T17:35:48.479Z] Failed Tests (5):
[2021-12-22T17:35:48.479Z] LLVM :: DeviceLib/built-ins/vector_relational.cpp
[2021-12-22T17:35:48.480Z] LLVM :: ESIMD/regression/dgetrf.cpp

Please, make sure these fails are reported.

[bader]

@vladimirlaz, please, merge when you think it's ready.

[alexbatashev]

XPTI test fails, because test fix also pulled in one line, that is only reported by #5172, which is not in this branch.

I'll think of ways of merging tip of SYCL into current branch to workaround this issue.

[bader]

I'll think of ways of merging tip of SYCL into current branch to workaround this issue.

For re-runs?

[alexbatashev]

I'll think of ways of merging tip of SYCL into current branch to workaround this issue.

For re-runs?

Exactly

[HabKaffee]

@alexbatashev Do I need merge last commits, merged into sycl, and re-run tests?

[HabKaffee]

/summary:run