Skip to content

[SYCL] Support kernels accepting item in range reduction parallel_for #7478

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2022

Conversation

aelovikov-intel
Copy link
Contributor

Previously only sycl::id worked.

Copy link
Contributor

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen merged commit 5d5e9f4 into intel:sycl Nov 22, 2022
pvchupin pushed a commit to intel/llvm-test-suite that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2022
aelovikov-intel added a commit to aelovikov-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
* ext::oneapi::reduction removed in intel#6634
* sycl::item in kernel supported since intel#7478
* sycl::range + many reductions implemented in intel#7456

There might be other things that have been implemented already, but I
cannot immediately identify them, if any.
bader pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2022
* ext::oneapi::reduction removed in
#6634
* sycl::item in kernel supported since
#7478
* sycl::range + many reductions implemented in
#7456
* CPU reduction performance implemented in
#6164
* span support implemented in #6019

There might be other things that have been implemented already, but I
cannot immediately identify them, if any.
aelovikov-intel added a commit to aelovikov-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel deleted the reduction-range-item branch April 7, 2023 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants