Skip to content

bpf, arm64: fix bpf line info #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: bpf, arm64: fix bpf line info
version: 3
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: edc21dc
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: d2b94f3
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 8cbf062
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 8cbf062
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 477bb4c
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 2e3f7be
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: f76d850
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 9b6eb04
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 1b8c924
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 9e98ace
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 1b8c924
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: b38101c
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: b75daca
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=612002
version: 3

kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2025
…uctions

Add several ./test_progs tests:

  - arena_atomics/load_acquire
  - arena_atomics/store_release
  - verifier_load_acquire/*
  - verifier_store_release/*
  - verifier_precision/bpf_load_acquire
  - verifier_precision/bpf_store_release

The last two tests are added to check if backtrack_insn() handles the
new instructions correctly.

Additionally, the last test also makes sure that the verifier
"remembers" the value (in src_reg) we store-release into e.g. a stack
slot.  For example, if we take a look at the test program:

    #0:  r1 = 8;
      /* store_release((u64 *)(r10 - 8), r1); */
    #1:  .8byte %[store_release];
    #2:  r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);
    #3:  r2 = r10;
    #4:  r2 += r1;
    #5:  r0 = 0;
    #6:  exit;

At #1, if the verifier doesn't remember that we wrote 8 to the stack,
then later at #4 we would be adding an unbounded scalar value to the
stack pointer, which would cause the program to be rejected:

  VERIFIER LOG:
  =============
...
  math between fp pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed

For easier CI integration, instead of using built-ins like
__atomic_{load,store}_n() which depend on the new
__BPF_FEATURE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL pre-defined macro, manually craft
load-acquire/store-release instructions using __imm_insn(), as suggested
by Eduard.

All new tests depend on:

  (1) Clang major version >= 18, and
  (2) ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS is defined (currently implies -mcpu=v3 or
      v4), and
  (3) JIT supports load-acquire/store-release (currently arm64 and
      x86-64)

In .../progs/arena_atomics.c:

  /* 8-byte-aligned */
  __u8 __arena_global load_acquire8_value = 0x12;
  /* 1-byte hole */
  __u16 __arena_global load_acquire16_value = 0x1234;

That 1-byte hole in the .addr_space.1 ELF section caused clang-17 to
crash:

  fatal error: error in backend: unable to write nop sequence of 1 bytes

To work around such llvm-17 CI job failures, conditionally define
__arena_global variables as 64-bit if __clang_major__ < 18, to make sure
.addr_space.1 has no holes.  Ideally we should avoid compiling this file
using clang-17 at all (arena tests depend on
__BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST, and are skipped for llvm-17 anyway), but
that is a separate topic.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1b46c6feaf0f1b6984d9ec80e500cc7383e9da1a.1741049567.git.yepeilin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2025
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD

KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.14, take #3

- Fix TCR_EL2 configuration to not use the ASID in TTBR1_EL2
  and not mess-up T1SZ/PS by using the HCR_EL2.E2H==0 layout.

- Bring back the VMID allocation to the vcpu_load phase, ensuring
  that we only setup VTTBR_EL2 once on VHE. This cures an ugly
  race that would lead to running with an unallocated VMID.
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2025
…uctions

Add several ./test_progs tests:

  - arena_atomics/load_acquire
  - arena_atomics/store_release
  - verifier_load_acquire/*
  - verifier_store_release/*
  - verifier_precision/bpf_load_acquire
  - verifier_precision/bpf_store_release

The last two tests are added to check if backtrack_insn() handles the
new instructions correctly.

Additionally, the last test also makes sure that the verifier
"remembers" the value (in src_reg) we store-release into e.g. a stack
slot.  For example, if we take a look at the test program:

    #0:  r1 = 8;
      /* store_release((u64 *)(r10 - 8), r1); */
    #1:  .8byte %[store_release];
    #2:  r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);
    #3:  r2 = r10;
    #4:  r2 += r1;
    #5:  r0 = 0;
    #6:  exit;

At #1, if the verifier doesn't remember that we wrote 8 to the stack,
then later at #4 we would be adding an unbounded scalar value to the
stack pointer, which would cause the program to be rejected:

  VERIFIER LOG:
  =============
...
  math between fp pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed

For easier CI integration, instead of using built-ins like
__atomic_{load,store}_n() which depend on the new
__BPF_FEATURE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL pre-defined macro, manually craft
load-acquire/store-release instructions using __imm_insn(), as suggested
by Eduard.

All new tests depend on:

  (1) Clang major version >= 18, and
  (2) ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS is defined (currently implies -mcpu=v3 or
      v4), and
  (3) JIT supports load-acquire/store-release (currently arm64 and
      x86-64)

In .../progs/arena_atomics.c:

  /* 8-byte-aligned */
  __u8 __arena_global load_acquire8_value = 0x12;
  /* 1-byte hole */
  __u16 __arena_global load_acquire16_value = 0x1234;

That 1-byte hole in the .addr_space.1 ELF section caused clang-17 to
crash:

  fatal error: error in backend: unable to write nop sequence of 1 bytes

To work around such llvm-17 CI job failures, conditionally define
__arena_global variables as 64-bit if __clang_major__ < 18, to make sure
.addr_space.1 has no holes.  Ideally we should avoid compiling this file
using clang-17 at all (arena tests depend on
__BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST, and are skipped for llvm-17 anyway), but
that is a separate topic.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1b46c6feaf0f1b6984d9ec80e500cc7383e9da1a.1741049567.git.yepeilin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2025
Use raw_spinlock in order to fix spurious messages about invalid context
when spinlock debugging is enabled. The lock is only used to serialize
register access.

    [    4.239592] =============================
    [    4.239595] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
    [    4.239599] 6.13.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05496-gd088502a519f #35 Not tainted
    [    4.239603] -----------------------------
    [    4.239606] kworker/u8:5/76 is trying to lock:
    [    4.239609] ffff0000091898a0 (&p->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: gpio_rcar_config_interrupt_input_mode+0x34/0x164
    [    4.239641] other info that might help us debug this:
    [    4.239643] context-{5:5}
    [    4.239646] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:5/76:
    [    4.239651]  #0: ffff0000080fb148 ((wq_completion)async){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x190/0x62c
    [    4.250180] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@0/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'frame-master' with a value.
    [    4.254094]  #1: ffff80008299bd80 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x62c
    [    4.254109]  #2: ffff00000920c8f8
    [    4.258345] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@1/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'bitclock-master' with a value.
    [    4.264803]  (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach_async_helper+0x3c/0xdc
    [    4.264820]  #3: ffff00000a50ca40 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0xa0/0x690
    [    4.264840]  #4:
    [    4.268872] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@1/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'frame-master' with a value.
    [    4.273275] ffff00000a50c8c8 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0xc4/0x690
    [    4.296130] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee100000.mmc: mmc1 base at 0x00000000ee100000, max clock rate 200 MHz
    [    4.304082] stack backtrace:
    [    4.304086] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 76 Comm: kworker/u8:5 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05496-gd088502a519f #35
    [    4.304092] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77965 (DT)
    [    4.304097] Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn
    [    4.304106] Call trace:
    [    4.304110]  show_stack+0x14/0x20 (C)
    [    4.304122]  dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x90
    [    4.304131]  dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
    [    4.304138]  __lock_acquire+0xdfc/0x1584
    [    4.426274]  lock_acquire+0x1c4/0x33c
    [    4.429942]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x80
    [    4.434307]  gpio_rcar_config_interrupt_input_mode+0x34/0x164
    [    4.440061]  gpio_rcar_irq_set_type+0xd4/0xd8
    [    4.444422]  __irq_set_trigger+0x5c/0x178
    [    4.448435]  __setup_irq+0x2e4/0x690
    [    4.452012]  request_threaded_irq+0xc4/0x190
    [    4.456285]  devm_request_threaded_irq+0x7c/0xf4
    [    4.459398] ata1: link resume succeeded after 1 retries
    [    4.460902]  mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq+0x68/0xe0
    [    4.470660]  mmc_start_host+0x50/0xac
    [    4.474327]  mmc_add_host+0x80/0xe4
    [    4.477817]  tmio_mmc_host_probe+0x2b0/0x440
    [    4.482094]  renesas_sdhi_probe+0x488/0x6f4
    [    4.486281]  renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_probe+0x60/0x78
    [    4.491509]  platform_probe+0x64/0xd8
    [    4.495178]  really_probe+0xb8/0x2a8
    [    4.498756]  __driver_probe_device+0x74/0x118
    [    4.503116]  driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x154
    [    4.507303]  __device_attach_driver+0xd4/0x160
    [    4.511750]  bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0
    [    4.515588]  __device_attach_async_helper+0xb0/0xdc
    [    4.520470]  async_run_entry_fn+0x30/0xd8
    [    4.524481]  process_one_work+0x210/0x62c
    [    4.528494]  worker_thread+0x1ac/0x340
    [    4.532245]  kthread+0x10c/0x110
    [    4.535476]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2025
…cal section

A circular lock dependency splat has been seen involving down_trylock():

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.12.0-41.el10.s390x+debug
  ------------------------------------------------------
  dd/32479 is trying to acquire lock:
  0015a20accd0d4f8 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: down_trylock+0x26/0x90

  but task is already holding lock:
  000000017e461698 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue_bulk+0xac/0x8f0

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
  -> #4 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
  -> #3 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
  -> #2 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
  -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
  -> #0 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:

The console_sem -> pi_lock dependency is due to calling try_to_wake_up()
while holding the console_sem raw_spinlock. This dependency can be broken
by using wake_q to do the wakeup instead of calling try_to_wake_up()
under the console_sem lock. This will also make the semaphore's
raw_spinlock become a terminal lock without taking any further locks
underneath it.

The hrtimer_bases.lock is a raw_spinlock while zone->lock is a
spinlock. The hrtimer_bases.lock -> zone->lock dependency happens via
the debug_objects_fill_pool() helper function in the debugobjects code.

  -> #4 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
         __lock_acquire+0xe86/0x1cc0
         lock_acquire.part.0+0x258/0x630
         lock_acquire+0xb8/0xe0
         _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb4/0x120
         rmqueue_bulk+0xac/0x8f0
         __rmqueue_pcplist+0x580/0x830
         rmqueue_pcplist+0xfc/0x470
         rmqueue.isra.0+0xdec/0x11b0
         get_page_from_freelist+0x2ee/0xeb0
         __alloc_pages_noprof+0x2c2/0x520
         alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x1fc/0x4d0
         alloc_pages_noprof+0x8c/0xe0
         allocate_slab+0x320/0x460
         ___slab_alloc+0xa58/0x12b0
         __slab_alloc.isra.0+0x42/0x60
         kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x304/0x350
         fill_pool+0xf6/0x450
         debug_object_activate+0xfe/0x360
         enqueue_hrtimer+0x34/0x190
         __run_hrtimer+0x3c8/0x4c0
         __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1b2/0x260
         hrtimer_interrupt+0x316/0x760
         do_IRQ+0x9a/0xe0
         do_irq_async+0xf6/0x160

Normally a raw_spinlock to spinlock dependency is not legitimate
and will be warned if CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING is enabled,
but debug_objects_fill_pool() is an exception as it explicitly
allows this dependency for non-PREEMPT_RT kernel without causing
PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING lockdep splat. As a result, this dependency is
legitimate and not a bug.

Anyway, semaphore is the only locking primitive left that is still
using try_to_wake_up() to do wakeup inside critical section, all the
other locking primitives had been migrated to use wake_q to do wakeup
outside of the critical section. It is also possible that there are
other circular locking dependencies involving printk/console_sem or
other existing/new semaphores lurking somewhere which may show up in
the future. Let just do the migration now to wake_q to avoid headache
like this.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2025
When mb-xdp is set and return is XDP_PASS, packet is converted from
xdp_buff to sk_buff with xdp_update_skb_shared_info() in
bnxt_xdp_build_skb().
bnxt_xdp_build_skb() passes incorrect truesize argument to
xdp_update_skb_shared_info().
The truesize is calculated as BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE * sinfo->nr_frags but
the skb_shared_info was wiped by napi_build_skb() before.
So it stores sinfo->nr_frags before bnxt_xdp_build_skb() and use it
instead of getting skb_shared_info from xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff().

Splat looks like:
 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/core/skbuff.c:6072 skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590
 Modules linked in: xt_nat xt_tcpudp veth af_packet xt_conntrack nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xt_addrtype nft_coms
 CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc2+ #3
 RIP: 0010:skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590
 Code: 4b fd ff ff 49 8b 34 24 40 80 e6 40 0f 84 3d fd ff ff 49 8b 74 24 48 40 f6 c6 01 0f 84 2e fd ff ff 48 8d 4e ff e9 25 fd ff ff <0f> 0b e99
 RSP: 0018:ffffb62c4120caa8 EFLAGS: 00010287
 RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: ffffb62c4120cb14 RCX: 0000000000000ec0
 RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffffa06e5d7dc000 RDI: 0000000000000003
 RBP: ffffa06e5d7ddec0 R08: ffffa06e6120a800 R09: ffffa06e7a119900
 R10: 0000000000002310 R11: ffffa06e5d7dcec0 R12: ffffe4360575f740
 R13: ffffe43600000000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa0755f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007f147b76b0f8 CR3: 00000001615d4000 CR4: 00000000007506f0
 PKRU: 55555554
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  ? __warn+0x84/0x130
  ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590
  ? report_bug+0x18a/0x1a0
  ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90
  ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
  ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590
  inet_frag_reasm_finish+0x11f/0x2e0
  ip_defrag+0x37a/0x900
  ip_local_deliver+0x51/0x120
  ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x64/0x70
  ip_sublist_rcv+0x179/0x210
  ip_list_rcv+0xf9/0x130

How to reproduce:
<Node A>
ip link set $interface1 xdp obj xdp_pass.o
ip link set $interface1 mtu 9000 up
ip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev $interface1
<Node B>
ip link set $interfac2 mtu 9000 up
ip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev $interface2
ping 10.0.0.1 -s 65000

Following ping.py patch adds xdp-mb-pass case. so ping.py is going to be
able to reproduce this issue.

Fixes: 1dc4c55 ("bnxt: adding bnxt_xdp_build_skb to build skb from multibuffer xdp_buff")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2025
Chia-Yu Chang says:

====================
AccECN protocol preparation patch series

Please find the v7

v7 (03-Mar-2025)
- Move 2 new patches added in v6 to the next AccECN patch series

v6 (27-Dec-2024)
- Avoid removing removing the potential CA_ACK_WIN_UPDATE in ack_ev_flags of patch #1 (Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>)
- Add reviewed-by tag in patches #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #12, #14
- Foloiwng 2 new pathces are added after patch #9 (Patch that adds SKB_GSO_TCP_ACCECN)
  * New patch #10 to replace exisiting SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN with SKB_GSO_TCP_ACCECN in the driver to avoid CWR flag corruption
  * New patch #11 adds AccECN for virtio by adding new negotiation flag (VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST/GUEST_ACCECN) in feature handshake and translating Accurate ECN GSO flag between virtio_net_hdr (VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ACCECN) and skb header (SKB_GSO_TCP_ACCECN)
- Add detailed changelog and comments in #13 (Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>)
- Move patch #14 to the next AccECN patch series (Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>)

v5 (5-Nov-2024)
- Add helper function "tcp_flags_ntohs" to preserve last 2 bytes of TCP flags of patch #4 (Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>)
- Fix reverse X-max tree order of patches #4, #11 (Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>)
- Rename variable "delta" as "timestamp_delta" of patch #2 fo clariety
- Remove patch #14 in this series (Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>, Joel Granados <[email protected]>)

v4 (21-Oct-2024)
- Fix line length warning of patches #2, #4, #8, #10, #11, #14
- Fix spaces preferred around '|' (ctx:VxV) warning of patch #7
- Add missing CC'ed of patches #4, #12, #14

v3 (19-Oct-2024)
- Fix build error in v2

v2 (18-Oct-2024)
- Fix warning caused by NETIF_F_GSO_ACCECN_BIT in patch #9 (Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>)

The full patch series can be found in
https://github.com/L4STeam/linux-net-next/commits/upstream_l4steam/

The Accurate ECN draft can be found in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-28
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
perf test 11 hwmon fails on s390 with this error

 # ./perf test -Fv 11
 --- start ---
 ---- end ----
 11.1: Basic parsing test             : Ok
 --- start ---
 Testing 'temp_test_hwmon_event1'
 Using CPUID IBM,3931,704,A01,3.7,002f
 temp_test_hwmon_event1 -> hwmon_a_test_hwmon_pmu/temp_test_hwmon_event1/
 FAILED tests/hwmon_pmu.c:189 Unexpected config for
    'temp_test_hwmon_event1', 292470092988416 != 655361
 ---- end ----
 11.2: Parsing without PMU name       : FAILED!
 --- start ---
 Testing 'hwmon_a_test_hwmon_pmu/temp_test_hwmon_event1/'
 FAILED tests/hwmon_pmu.c:189 Unexpected config for
    'hwmon_a_test_hwmon_pmu/temp_test_hwmon_event1/',
    292470092988416 != 655361
 ---- end ----
 11.3: Parsing with PMU name          : FAILED!
 #

The root cause is in member test_event::config which is initialized
to 0xA0001 or 655361. During event parsing a long list event parsing
functions are called and end up with this gdb call stack:

 #0  hwmon_pmu__config_term (hwm=0x168dfd0, attr=0x3ffffff5ee8,
	term=0x168db60, err=0x3ffffff81c8) at util/hwmon_pmu.c:623
 #1  hwmon_pmu__config_terms (pmu=0x168dfd0, attr=0x3ffffff5ee8,
	terms=0x3ffffff5ea8, err=0x3ffffff81c8) at util/hwmon_pmu.c:662
 #2  0x00000000012f870c in perf_pmu__config_terms (pmu=0x168dfd0,
	attr=0x3ffffff5ee8, terms=0x3ffffff5ea8, zero=false,
	apply_hardcoded=false, err=0x3ffffff81c8) at util/pmu.c:1519
 #3  0x00000000012f88a4 in perf_pmu__config (pmu=0x168dfd0, attr=0x3ffffff5ee8,
	head_terms=0x3ffffff5ea8, apply_hardcoded=false, err=0x3ffffff81c8)
	at util/pmu.c:1545
 #4  0x00000000012680c4 in parse_events_add_pmu (parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8,
	list=0x168dc00, pmu=0x168dfd0, const_parsed_terms=0x3ffffff6090,
	auto_merge_stats=true, alternate_hw_config=10)
	at util/parse-events.c:1508
 #5  0x00000000012684c6 in parse_events_multi_pmu_add (parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8,
	event_name=0x168ec10 "temp_test_hwmon_event1", hw_config=10,
	const_parsed_terms=0x0, listp=0x3ffffff6230, loc_=0x3ffffff70e0)
	at util/parse-events.c:1592
 #6  0x00000000012f0e4e in parse_events_parse (_parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8,
	scanner=0x16878c0) at util/parse-events.y:293
 #7  0x00000000012695a0 in parse_events__scanner (str=0x3ffffff81d8
	"temp_test_hwmon_event1", input=0x0, parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8)
	at util/parse-events.c:1867
 #8  0x000000000126a1e8 in __parse_events (evlist=0x168b580,
	str=0x3ffffff81d8 "temp_test_hwmon_event1", pmu_filter=0x0,
	err=0x3ffffff81c8, fake_pmu=false, warn_if_reordered=true,
	fake_tp=false) at util/parse-events.c:2136
 #9  0x00000000011e36aa in parse_events (evlist=0x168b580,
	str=0x3ffffff81d8 "temp_test_hwmon_event1", err=0x3ffffff81c8)
	at /root/linux/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h:41
 #10 0x00000000011e3e64 in do_test (i=0, with_pmu=false, with_alias=false)
	at tests/hwmon_pmu.c:164
 #11 0x00000000011e422c in test__hwmon_pmu (with_pmu=false)
	at tests/hwmon_pmu.c:219
 #12 0x00000000011e431c in test__hwmon_pmu_without_pmu (test=0x1610368
	<suite.hwmon_pmu>, subtest=1) at tests/hwmon_pmu.c:23

where the attr::config is set to value 292470092988416 or 0x10a0000000000
in line 625 of file ./util/hwmon_pmu.c:

   attr->config = key.type_and_num;

However member key::type_and_num is defined as union and bit field:

   union hwmon_pmu_event_key {
        long type_and_num;
        struct {
                int num :16;
                enum hwmon_type type :8;
        };
   };

s390 is big endian and Intel is little endian architecture.
The events for the hwmon dummy pmu have num = 1 or num = 2 and
type is set to HWMON_TYPE_TEMP (which is 10).
On s390 this assignes member key::type_and_num the value of
0x10a0000000000 (which is 292470092988416) as shown in above
trace output.

Fix this and export the structure/union hwmon_pmu_event_key
so the test shares the same implementation as the event parsing
functions for union and bit fields. This should avoid
endianess issues on all platforms.

Output after:
 # ./perf test -F 11
 11.1: Basic parsing test         : Ok
 11.2: Parsing without PMU name   : Ok
 11.3: Parsing with PMU name      : Ok
 #

Fixes: 531ee0f ("perf test: Add hwmon "PMU" test")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
Ian told me that there are many memory leaks in the hierarchy mode.  I
can easily reproduce it with the follwing command.

  $ make DEBUG=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS=-fsanitize=leak

  $ perf record --latency -g -- ./perf test -w thloop

  $ perf report -H --stdio
  ...
  Indirect leak of 168 byte(s) in 21 object(s) allocated from:
      #0 0x7f3414c16c65 in malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:75
      #1 0x55ed3602346e in map__get util/map.h:189
      #2 0x55ed36024cc4 in hist_entry__init util/hist.c:476
      #3 0x55ed36025208 in hist_entry__new util/hist.c:588
      #4 0x55ed36027c05 in hierarchy_insert_entry util/hist.c:1587
      #5 0x55ed36027e2e in hists__hierarchy_insert_entry util/hist.c:1638
      #6 0x55ed36027fa4 in hists__collapse_insert_entry util/hist.c:1685
      #7 0x55ed360283e8 in hists__collapse_resort util/hist.c:1776
      #8 0x55ed35de0323 in report__collapse_hists /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c:735
      #9 0x55ed35de15b4 in __cmd_report /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c:1119
      #10 0x55ed35de43dc in cmd_report /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c:1867
      #11 0x55ed35e66767 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:351
      #12 0x55ed35e66a0e in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:404
      #13 0x55ed35e66b67 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:448
      #14 0x55ed35e66eb0 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:556
      #15 0x7f340ac33d67 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
  ...

  $ perf report -H --stdio 2>&1 | grep -c '^Indirect leak'
  93

I found that hist_entry__delete() missed to release child entries in the
hierarchy tree (hroot_{in,out}).  It needs to iterate the child entries
and call hist_entry__delete() recursively.

After this change:

  $ perf report -H --stdio 2>&1 | grep -c '^Indirect leak'
  0

Reported-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Tested-by Thomas Falcon <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
The env.pmu_mapping can be leaked when it reads data from a pipe on AMD.
For a pipe data, it reads the header data including pmu_mapping from
PERF_RECORD_HEADER_FEATURE runtime.  But it's already set in:

  perf_session__new()
    __perf_session__new()
      evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw()
        evlist__has_amd_ibs()
          perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings()

Then it'll overwrite that when it processes the HEADER_FEATURE record.
Here's a report from address sanitizer.

  Direct leak of 2689 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fed8f814596 in realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98
    #1 0x5595a7d416b1 in strbuf_grow util/strbuf.c:64
    #2 0x5595a7d414ef in strbuf_init util/strbuf.c:25
    #3 0x5595a7d0f4b7 in perf_env__read_pmu_mappings util/env.c:362
    #4 0x5595a7d12ab7 in perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings util/env.c:517
    #5 0x5595a7d89d2f in evlist__has_amd_ibs util/amd-sample-raw.c:315
    #6 0x5595a7d87fb2 in evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw util/sample-raw.c:23
    #7 0x5595a7d7f893 in __perf_session__new util/session.c:179
    #8 0x5595a7b79572 in perf_session__new util/session.h:115
    #9 0x5595a7b7e9dc in cmd_report builtin-report.c:1603
    #10 0x5595a7c019eb in run_builtin perf.c:351
    #11 0x5595a7c01c92 in handle_internal_command perf.c:404
    #12 0x5595a7c01deb in run_argv perf.c:448
    #13 0x5595a7c02134 in main perf.c:556
    #14 0x7fed85833d67 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

Let's free the existing pmu_mapping data if any.

Cc: Ravi Bangoria <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
Patch series "Fix calculations in trace_balance_dirty_pages() for cgwb", v2.

In my experiment, I found that the output of trace_balance_dirty_pages()
in the cgroup writeback scenario was strange because
trace_balance_dirty_pages() always uses global_wb_domain.dirty_limit for
related calculations instead of the dirty_limit of the corresponding
memcg's wb_domain.

The basic idea of the fix is to store the hard dirty limit value computed
in wb_position_ratio() into struct dirty_throttle_control and use it for
calculations in trace_balance_dirty_pages().


This patch (of 3):

Currently, trace_balance_dirty_pages() already has 12 parameters.  In the
patch #3, I initially attempted to introduce an additional parameter. 
However, in include/linux/trace_events.h, bpf_trace_run12() only supports
up to 12 parameters and bpf_trace_run13() does not exist.

To reduce the number of parameters in trace_balance_dirty_pages(), we can
make it accept a pointer to struct dirty_throttle_control as a parameter. 
To achieve this, we need to move the definition of struct
dirty_throttle_control from mm/page-writeback.c to
include/linux/writeback.h.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcow (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Cc: Tang Yizhou <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
Patch series "mm: page_ext: Introduce new iteration API", v3.

Introduction
============

  [ Thanks to David Hildenbrand for identifying the root cause of this
    issue and proving guidance on how to fix it. The new API idea, bugs
    and misconceptions are all mine though ]

Currently, trying to reserve 1G pages with page_owner=on and sparsemem
causes a crash. The reproducer is very simple:

 1. Build the kernel with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y and the table extensions
 2. Pass 'default_hugepagesz=1 page_owner=on' in the kernel command-line
 3. Reserve one 1G page at run-time, this should crash (see patch 1 for
    backtrace) 

 [ A crash with page_table_check is also possible, but harder to trigger ]

Apparently, starting with commit cf54f31 ("mm/hugetlb: use __GFP_COMP
for gigantic folios") we now pass the full allocation order to page
extension clients and the page extension implementation assumes that all
PFNs of an allocation range will be stored in the same memory section (which
is not true for 1G pages).

To fix this, this series introduces a new iteration API for page extension
objects. The API checks if the next page extension object can be retrieved
from the current section or if it needs to look up for it in another
section.

Please, find all details in patch 1.

I tested this series on arm64 and x86 by reserving 1G pages at run-time
and doing kernel builds (always with page_owner=on and page_table_check=on).


This patch (of 3):

The page extension implementation assumes that all page extensions of a
given page order are stored in the same memory section.  The function
page_ext_next() relies on this assumption by adding an offset to the
current object to return the next adjacent page extension.

This behavior works as expected for flatmem but fails for sparsemem when
using 1G pages.  The commit cf54f31 ("mm/hugetlb: use __GFP_COMP for
gigantic folios") exposes this issue, making it possible for a crash when
using page_owner or page_table_check page extensions.

The problem is that for 1G pages, the page extensions may span memory
section boundaries and be stored in different memory sections.  This issue
was not visible before commit cf54f31 ("mm/hugetlb: use __GFP_COMP
for gigantic folios") because alloc_contig_pages() never passed more than
MAX_PAGE_ORDER to post_alloc_hook().  However, the series introducing
mentioned commit changed this behavior allowing the full 1G page order to
be passed.

Reproducer:

 1. Build the kernel with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y and table extensions
    support
 2. Pass 'default_hugepagesz=1 page_owner=on' in the kernel command-line
 3. Reserve one 1G page at run-time, this should crash (backtrace below)

To address this issue, this commit introduces a new API for iterating
through page extensions.  The main iteration macro is for_each_page_ext()
and it must be called with the RCU read lock taken.  Here's an usage
example:

"""
struct page_ext_iter iter;
struct page_ext *page_ext;

...

rcu_read_lock();
for_each_page_ext(page, 1 << order, page_ext, iter) {
	struct my_page_ext *obj = get_my_page_ext_obj(page_ext);
	...
}
rcu_read_unlock();
"""

The loop construct uses page_ext_iter_next() which checks to see if we
have crossed sections in the iteration.  In this case,
page_ext_iter_next() retrieves the next page_ext object from another
section.

Thanks to David Hildenbrand for helping identify the root cause and
providing suggestions on how to fix and optmize the solution (final
implementation and bugs are all mine through).

Lastly, here's the backtrace, without kasan you can get random crashes:

[   76.052526] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in __update_page_owner_handle+0x238/0x298
[   76.060283] Write of size 4 at addr ffff07ff96240038 by task tee/3598
[   76.066714]
[   76.068203] CPU: 88 UID: 0 PID: 3598 Comm: tee Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.13.0-rep1 #3
[   76.076202] Hardware name: WIWYNN Mt.Jade Server System B81.030Z1.0007/Mt.Jade Motherboard, BIOS 2.10.20220810 (SCP: 2.10.20220810) 2022/08/10
[   76.088972] Call trace:
[   76.091411]  show_stack+0x20/0x38 (C)
[   76.095073]  dump_stack_lvl+0x80/0xf8
[   76.098733]  print_address_description.constprop.0+0x88/0x398
[   76.104476]  print_report+0xa8/0x278
[   76.108041]  kasan_report+0xa8/0xf8
[   76.111520]  __asan_report_store4_noabort+0x20/0x30
[   76.116391]  __update_page_owner_handle+0x238/0x298
[   76.121259]  __set_page_owner+0xdc/0x140
[   76.125173]  post_alloc_hook+0x190/0x1d8
[   76.129090]  alloc_contig_range_noprof+0x54c/0x890
[   76.133874]  alloc_contig_pages_noprof+0x35c/0x4a8
[   76.138656]  alloc_gigantic_folio.isra.0+0x2c0/0x368
[   76.143616]  only_alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio.isra.0+0x24/0x150
[   76.149353]  alloc_pool_huge_folio+0x11c/0x1f8
[   76.153787]  set_max_huge_pages+0x364/0xca8
[   76.157961]  __nr_hugepages_store_common+0xb0/0x1a0
[   76.162829]  nr_hugepages_store+0x108/0x118
[   76.167003]  kobj_attr_store+0x3c/0x70
[   76.170745]  sysfs_kf_write+0xfc/0x188
[   76.174492]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x274/0x3e0
[   76.178927]  vfs_write+0x64c/0x8e0
[   76.182323]  ksys_write+0xf8/0x1f0
[   76.185716]  __arm64_sys_write+0x74/0xb0
[   76.189630]  invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0xd8/0x1e0
[   76.194412]  do_el0_svc+0x164/0x1e0
[   76.197891]  el0_svc+0x40/0xe0
[   76.200939]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x144/0x168
[   76.205287]  el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a45893880b7e1601082d39d2c5c8b50bcc096305.1741301089.git.luizcap@redhat.com
Fixes: cf54f31 ("mm/hugetlb: use __GFP_COMP for gigantic folios")
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <[email protected]>
Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <[email protected]>
Cc: Yu Zhao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
Syzkaller reports a bug as follows:

Injecting memory failure for pfn 0x18b00e at process virtual address 0x20ffd000
Memory failure: 0x18b00e: dirty swapcache page still referenced by 2 users
Memory failure: 0x18b00e: recovery action for dirty swapcache page: Failed
page: refcount:2 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x20ffd pfn:0x18b00e
memcg:ffff0000dd6d9000
anon flags: 0x5ffffe00482011(locked|dirty|arch_1|swapbacked|hwpoison|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xfffff)
raw: 005ffffe00482011 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff0000e232a7c9
raw: 0000000000020ffd 0000000000000000 00000002ffffffff ffff0000dd6d9000
page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_uptodate(folio))
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/swap_state.c:184!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 60 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.6.0-gcb097e7de84e #3
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : add_to_swap+0xbc/0x158
lr : add_to_swap+0xbc/0x158
sp : ffff800087f37340
x29: ffff800087f37340 x28: fffffc00052c0380 x27: ffff800087f37780
x26: ffff800087f37490 x25: ffff800087f37c78 x24: ffff800087f377a0
x23: ffff800087f37c50 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: fffffc00052c03b4
x20: 0000000000000000 x19: fffffc00052c0380 x18: 0000000000000000
x17: 296f696c6f662865 x16: 7461646f7470755f x15: 747365745f6f696c
x14: 6f6621284f494c4f x13: 0000000000000001 x12: ffff600036d8b97b
x11: 1fffe00036d8b97a x10: ffff600036d8b97a x9 : dfff800000000000
x8 : 00009fffc9274686 x7 : ffff0001b6c5cbd3 x6 : 0000000000000001
x5 : ffff0000c25896c0 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff0000c25896c0 x0 : 0000000000000000
Call trace:
 add_to_swap+0xbc/0x158
 shrink_folio_list+0x12ac/0x2648
 shrink_inactive_list+0x318/0x948
 shrink_lruvec+0x450/0x720
 shrink_node_memcgs+0x280/0x4a8
 shrink_node+0x128/0x978
 balance_pgdat+0x4f0/0xb20
 kswapd+0x228/0x438
 kthread+0x214/0x230
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

I can reproduce this issue with the following steps:

1) When a dirty swapcache page is isolated by reclaim process and the
   page isn't locked, inject memory failure for the page. 
   me_swapcache_dirty() clears uptodate flag and tries to delete from lru,
   but fails.  Reclaim process will put the hwpoisoned page back to lru.

2) The process that maps the hwpoisoned page exits, the page is deleted
   the page will never be freed and will be in the lru forever.

3) If we trigger a reclaim again and tries to reclaim the page,
   add_to_swap() will trigger VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO due to the uptodate flag is
   cleared.

To fix it, skip the hwpoisoned page in shrink_folio_list().  Besides, the
hwpoison folio may not be unmapped by hwpoison_user_mappings() yet, unmap
it in shrink_folio_list(), otherwise the folio will fail to be unmaped by
hwpoison_user_mappings() since the folio isn't in lru list.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Cc: <stable@vger,kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
When a bio with REQ_PREFLUSH is submitted to dm, __send_empty_flush()
generates a flush_bio with REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_SYNC,
which causes the flush_bio to be throttled by wbt_wait().

An example from v5.4, similar problem also exists in upstream:

    crash> bt 2091206
    PID: 2091206  TASK: ffff2050df92a300  CPU: 109  COMMAND: "kworker/u260:0"
     #0 [ffff800084a2f7f0] __switch_to at ffff80004008aeb8
     #1 [ffff800084a2f820] __schedule at ffff800040bfa0c4
     #2 [ffff800084a2f880] schedule at ffff800040bfa4b4
     #3 [ffff800084a2f8a0] io_schedule at ffff800040bfa9c4
     #4 [ffff800084a2f8c0] rq_qos_wait at ffff8000405925bc
     #5 [ffff800084a2f940] wbt_wait at ffff8000405bb3a0
     #6 [ffff800084a2f9a0] __rq_qos_throttle at ffff800040592254
     #7 [ffff800084a2f9c0] blk_mq_make_request at ffff80004057cf38
     #8 [ffff800084a2fa60] generic_make_request at ffff800040570138
     #9 [ffff800084a2fae0] submit_bio at ffff8000405703b4
    #10 [ffff800084a2fb50] xlog_write_iclog at ffff800001280834 [xfs]
    #11 [ffff800084a2fbb0] xlog_sync at ffff800001280c3c [xfs]
    #12 [ffff800084a2fbf0] xlog_state_release_iclog at ffff800001280df4 [xfs]
    #13 [ffff800084a2fc10] xlog_write at ffff80000128203c [xfs]
    #14 [ffff800084a2fcd0] xlog_cil_push at ffff8000012846dc [xfs]
    #15 [ffff800084a2fda0] xlog_cil_push_work at ffff800001284a2c [xfs]
    #16 [ffff800084a2fdb0] process_one_work at ffff800040111d08
    #17 [ffff800084a2fe00] worker_thread at ffff8000401121cc
    #18 [ffff800084a2fe70] kthread at ffff800040118de4

After commit 2def284 ("xfs: don't allow log IO to be throttled"),
the metadata submitted by xlog_write_iclog() should not be throttled.
But due to the existence of the dm layer, throttling flush_bio indirectly
causes the metadata bio to be throttled.

Fix this by conditionally adding REQ_IDLE to flush_bio.bi_opf, which makes
wbt_should_throttle() return false to avoid wbt_wait().

Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tianxiang Peng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hao Peng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
A cache device failing to resume due to mapping errors should not be
retried, as the failure leaves a partially initialized policy object.
Repeating the resume operation risks triggering BUG_ON when reloading
cache mappings into the incomplete policy object.

Reproduce steps:

1. create a cache metadata consisting of 512 or more cache blocks,
   with some mappings stored in the first array block of the mapping
   array. Here we use cache_restore v1.0 to build the metadata.

cat <<EOF >> cmeta.xml
<superblock uuid="" block_size="128" nr_cache_blocks="512" \
policy="smq" hint_width="4">
  <mappings>
    <mapping cache_block="0" origin_block="0" dirty="false"/>
  </mappings>
</superblock>
EOF
dmsetup create cmeta --table "0 8192 linear /dev/sdc 0"
cache_restore -i cmeta.xml -o /dev/mapper/cmeta --metadata-version=2
dmsetup remove cmeta

2. wipe the second array block of the mapping array to simulate
   data degradations.

mapping_root=$(dd if=/dev/sdc bs=1c count=8 skip=192 \
2>/dev/null | hexdump -e '1/8 "%u\n"')
ablock=$(dd if=/dev/sdc bs=1c count=8 skip=$((4096*mapping_root+2056)) \
2>/dev/null | hexdump -e '1/8 "%u\n"')
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc bs=4k count=1 seek=$ablock

3. try bringing up the cache device. The resume is expected to fail
   due to the broken array block.

dmsetup create cmeta --table "0 8192 linear /dev/sdc 0"
dmsetup create cdata --table "0 65536 linear /dev/sdc 8192"
dmsetup create corig --table "0 524288 linear /dev/sdc 262144"
dmsetup create cache --notable
dmsetup load cache --table "0 524288 cache /dev/mapper/cmeta \
/dev/mapper/cdata /dev/mapper/corig 128 2 metadata2 writethrough smq 0"
dmsetup resume cache

4. try resuming the cache again. An unexpected BUG_ON is triggered
   while loading cache mappings.

dmsetup resume cache

Kernel logs:

(snip)
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-smq.c:752!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 332 Comm: dmsetup Not tainted 6.13.4 #3
RIP: 0010:smq_load_mapping+0x3e5/0x570

Fix by disallowing resume operations for devices that failed the
initial attempt.

Signed-off-by: Ming-Hung Tsai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
Two fixes from the recent logging changes:

bch2_inconsistent(), bch2_fs_inconsistent() be called from interrupt
context, or with rcu_read_lock() held.

The one syzbot found is in
  bch2_bkey_pick_read_device
  bch2_dev_rcu
  bch2_fs_inconsistent

We're starting to switch to lift the printbufs up to higher levels so we
can emit better log messages and print them all in one go (avoid
garbling), so that conversion will help with spotting these in the
future; when we declare a printbuf it must be flagged if we're in an
atomic context.

Secondly, in btree_node_write_endio:

00085 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched/mm.h:321
00085 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 618, name: bch-reclaim/fa6
00085 preempt_count: 10001, expected: 0
00085 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
00085 4 locks held by bch-reclaim/fa6/618:
00085  #0: ffffff80d7ccad68 (&j->reclaim_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bch2_journal_reclaim_thread+0x84/0x198
00085  #1: ffffff80d7c84218 (&c->btree_trans_barrier){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __bch2_trans_get+0x1c0/0x440
00085  #2: ffffff80cd3f8140 (bcachefs_btree){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __bch2_trans_get+0x22c/0x440
00085  #3: ffffff80c3823c20 (&vblk->vqs[i].lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: virtblk_done+0x58/0x130
00085 irq event stamp: 328
00085 hardirqs last  enabled at (327): [<ffffffc080073a14>] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xbc/0x2a0
00085 hardirqs last disabled at (328): [<ffffffc080971a10>] el1_interrupt+0x20/0x60
00085 softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffc08002f920>] copy_process+0x7c8/0x2118
00085 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
00085 Preemption disabled at:
00085 [<ffffffc08003ada0>] irq_enter_rcu+0x18/0x90
00085 CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 618 Comm: bch-reclaim/fa6 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc6-ktest-g04630bde23e8 #18798
00085 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
00085 Call trace:
00085  show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C)
00085  dump_stack_lvl+0x84/0xc0
00085  dump_stack+0x14/0x20
00085  __might_resched+0x180/0x288
00085  __might_sleep+0x4c/0x88
00085  __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x34c/0x3e0
00085  krealloc_noprof+0x1a0/0x2d8
00085  bch2_printbuf_make_room+0x9c/0x120
00085  bch2_prt_printf+0x60/0x1b8
00085  btree_node_write_endio+0x1b0/0x2d8
00085  bio_endio+0x138/0x1f0
00085  btree_node_write_endio+0xe8/0x2d8
00085  bio_endio+0x138/0x1f0
00085  blk_update_request+0x220/0x4c0
00085  blk_mq_end_request+0x28/0x148
00085  virtblk_request_done+0x64/0xe8
00085  blk_mq_complete_request+0x34/0x40
00085  virtblk_done+0x78/0x130
00085  vring_interrupt+0x6c/0xb0
00085  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x8c/0x2e0
00085  handle_irq_event+0x50/0xb0
00085  handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc4/0x250
00085  handle_irq_desc+0x44/0x60
00085  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x20/0x30
00085  gic_handle_irq+0x54/0xc8
00085  call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x40

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2025
v2:
- Created a single error handling unlock and exit in veth_pool_store
- Greatly expanded commit message with previous explanatory-only text

Summary: Use rtnl_mutex to synchronize veth_pool_store with itself,
ibmveth_close and ibmveth_open, preventing multiple calls in a row to
napi_disable.

Background: Two (or more) threads could call veth_pool_store through
writing to /sys/devices/vio/30000002/pool*/*. You can do this easily
with a little shell script. This causes a hang.

I configured LOCKDEP, compiled ibmveth.c with DEBUG, and built a new
kernel. I ran this test again and saw:

    Setting pool0/active to 0
    Setting pool1/active to 1
    [   73.911067][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close starting
    Setting pool1/active to 1
    Setting pool1/active to 0
    [   73.911367][ T4366] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close starting
    [   73.916056][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close complete
    [   73.916064][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: open starting
    [  110.808564][  T712] systemd-journald[712]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.
    [  230.808495][  T712] systemd-journald[712]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.
    [  243.683786][  T123] INFO: task stress.sh:4365 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
    [  243.683827][  T123]       Not tainted 6.14.0-01103-g2df0c02dab82-dirty #8
    [  243.683833][  T123] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
    [  243.683838][  T123] task:stress.sh       state:D stack:28096 pid:4365  tgid:4365  ppid:4364   task_flags:0x400040 flags:0x00042000
    [  243.683852][  T123] Call Trace:
    [  243.683857][  T123] [c00000000c38f690] [0000000000000001] 0x1 (unreliable)
    [  243.683868][  T123] [c00000000c38f840] [c00000000001f908] __switch_to+0x318/0x4e0
    [  243.683878][  T123] [c00000000c38f8a0] [c000000001549a70] __schedule+0x500/0x12a0
    [  243.683888][  T123] [c00000000c38f9a0] [c00000000154a878] schedule+0x68/0x210
    [  243.683896][  T123] [c00000000c38f9d0] [c00000000154ac80] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x30/0x50
    [  243.683904][  T123] [c00000000c38fa00] [c00000000154dbb0] __mutex_lock+0x730/0x10f0
    [  243.683913][  T123] [c00000000c38fb10] [c000000001154d40] napi_enable+0x30/0x60
    [  243.683921][  T123] [c00000000c38fb40] [c000000000f4ae94] ibmveth_open+0x68/0x5dc
    [  243.683928][  T123] [c00000000c38fbe0] [c000000000f4aa20] veth_pool_store+0x220/0x270
    [  243.683936][  T123] [c00000000c38fc70] [c000000000826278] sysfs_kf_write+0x68/0xb0
    [  243.683944][  T123] [c00000000c38fcb0] [c0000000008240b8] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x198/0x2d0
    [  243.683951][  T123] [c00000000c38fd00] [c00000000071b9ac] vfs_write+0x34c/0x650
    [  243.683958][  T123] [c00000000c38fdc0] [c00000000071bea8] ksys_write+0x88/0x150
    [  243.683966][  T123] [c00000000c38fe10] [c0000000000317f4] system_call_exception+0x124/0x340
    [  243.683973][  T123] [c00000000c38fe50] [c00000000000d05c] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
    ...
    [  243.684087][  T123] Showing all locks held in the system:
    [  243.684095][  T123] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/123:
    [  243.684099][  T123]  #0: c00000000278e370 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x50/0x248
    [  243.684114][  T123] 4 locks held by stress.sh/4365:
    [  243.684119][  T123]  #0: c00000003a4cd3f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x88/0x150
    [  243.684132][  T123]  #1: c000000041aea888 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x2d0
    [  243.684143][  T123]  #2: c0000000366fb9a8 (kn->active#64){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x160/0x2d0
    [  243.684155][  T123]  #3: c000000035ff4cb8 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: napi_enable+0x30/0x60
    [  243.684166][  T123] 5 locks held by stress.sh/4366:
    [  243.684170][  T123]  #0: c00000003a4cd3f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x88/0x150
    [  243.684183][  T123]  #1: c00000000aee2288 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x2d0
    [  243.684194][  T123]  #2: c0000000366f4ba8 (kn->active#64){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x160/0x2d0
    [  243.684205][  T123]  #3: c000000035ff4cb8 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: napi_disable+0x30/0x60
    [  243.684216][  T123]  #4: c0000003ff9bbf18 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __schedule+0x138/0x12a0

From the ibmveth debug, two threads are calling veth_pool_store, which
calls ibmveth_close and ibmveth_open. Here's the sequence:

  T4365             T4366
  ----------------- ----------------- ---------
  veth_pool_store   veth_pool_store
                    ibmveth_close
  ibmveth_close
  napi_disable
                    napi_disable
  ibmveth_open
  napi_enable                         <- HANG

ibmveth_close calls napi_disable at the top and ibmveth_open calls
napi_enable at the top.

https://docs.kernel.org/networking/napi.html]] says

  The control APIs are not idempotent. Control API calls are safe
  against concurrent use of datapath APIs but an incorrect sequence of
  control API calls may result in crashes, deadlocks, or race
  conditions. For example, calling napi_disable() multiple times in a
  row will deadlock.

In the normal open and close paths, rtnl_mutex is acquired to prevent
other callers. This is missing from veth_pool_store. Use rtnl_mutex in
veth_pool_store fixes these hangs.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marquardt <[email protected]>
Fixes: 860f242 ("[PATCH] ibmveth change buffer pools dynamically")
Reviewed-by: Nick Child <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
As reported by CVE-2025-29481 [1], it is possible to corrupt a BPF ELF
file such that arbitrary BPF instructions are loaded by libbpf. This can
be done by setting a symbol (BPF program) section offset to a large
(unsigned) number such that <section start + symbol offset> overflows
and points before the section data in the memory.

Consider the situation below where:
- prog_start = sec_start + symbol_offset    <-- size_t overflow here
- prog_end   = prog_start + prog_size

    prog_start        sec_start        prog_end        sec_end
        |                |                 |              |
        v                v                 v              v
    .....................|################################|............

The CVE report in [1] also provides a corrupted BPF ELF which can be
used as a reproducer:

    $ readelf -S crash
    Section Headers:
      [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
           Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
      [ 2] uretprobe.mu[...] PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000040
           0000000000000068  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     8

    $ readelf -s crash
    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 8 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
    ...
         6: ffffffffffffffb8   104 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT    2 handle_tp

Here, the handle_tp prog has section offset ffffffffffffffb8, i.e. will
point before the actual memory where section 2 is allocated.

This is also reported by AddressSanitizer:

    =================================================================
    ==1232==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7c7302fe0000 at pc 0x7fc3046e4b77 bp 0x7ffe64677cd0 sp 0x7ffe64677490
    READ of size 104 at 0x7c7302fe0000 thread T0
        #0 0x7fc3046e4b76 in memcpy (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe4b76)
        #1 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__init_prog /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:856
        #2 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__add_programs /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:928
        #3 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__elf_collect /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3930
        #4 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object_open /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8067
        #5 0x00000040f176 in bpf_object__open_file /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8090
        #6 0x000000400c16 in main /poc/poc.c:8
        #7 0x7fc3043d25b4 in __libc_start_call_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x35b4)
        #8 0x7fc3043d2667 in __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3667)
        #9 0x000000400b34 in _start (/poc/poc+0x400b34)

    0x7c7302fe0000 is located 64 bytes before 104-byte region [0x7c7302fe0040,0x7c7302fe00a8)
    allocated by thread T0 here:
        #0 0x7fc3046e716b in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe716b)
        #1 0x7fc3045ee600 in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xb600)
        #2 0x7fc3045ef018 in __elf_getdata_rdlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xc018)
        #3 0x00000040642f in elf_sec_data /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3740

The problem here is that currently, libbpf only checks that the program
end is within the section bounds. There used to be a check
`while (sec_off < sec_sz)` in bpf_object__add_programs, however, it was
removed by commit 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program
sections to support overriden weak functions").

Put the above condition back to bpf_object__init_prog to make sure that
the program start is also within the bounds of the section to avoid the
potential buffer overflow.

[1] https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md

Reported-by: lmarch2 <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions")
Link: https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md
Link: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29481
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
As reported by CVE-2025-29481 [1], it is possible to corrupt a BPF ELF
file such that arbitrary BPF instructions are loaded by libbpf. This can
be done by setting a symbol (BPF program) section offset to a large
(unsigned) number such that <section start + symbol offset> overflows
and points before the section data in the memory.

Consider the situation below where:
- prog_start = sec_start + symbol_offset    <-- size_t overflow here
- prog_end   = prog_start + prog_size

    prog_start        sec_start        prog_end        sec_end
        |                |                 |              |
        v                v                 v              v
    .....................|################################|............

The CVE report in [1] also provides a corrupted BPF ELF which can be
used as a reproducer:

    $ readelf -S crash
    Section Headers:
      [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
           Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
      [ 2] uretprobe.mu[...] PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000040
           0000000000000068  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     8

    $ readelf -s crash
    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 8 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
    ...
         6: ffffffffffffffb8   104 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT    2 handle_tp

Here, the handle_tp prog has section offset ffffffffffffffb8, i.e. will
point before the actual memory where section 2 is allocated.

This is also reported by AddressSanitizer:

    =================================================================
    ==1232==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7c7302fe0000 at pc 0x7fc3046e4b77 bp 0x7ffe64677cd0 sp 0x7ffe64677490
    READ of size 104 at 0x7c7302fe0000 thread T0
        #0 0x7fc3046e4b76 in memcpy (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe4b76)
        #1 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__init_prog /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:856
        #2 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__add_programs /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:928
        #3 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__elf_collect /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3930
        #4 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object_open /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8067
        #5 0x00000040f176 in bpf_object__open_file /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8090
        #6 0x000000400c16 in main /poc/poc.c:8
        #7 0x7fc3043d25b4 in __libc_start_call_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x35b4)
        #8 0x7fc3043d2667 in __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3667)
        #9 0x000000400b34 in _start (/poc/poc+0x400b34)

    0x7c7302fe0000 is located 64 bytes before 104-byte region [0x7c7302fe0040,0x7c7302fe00a8)
    allocated by thread T0 here:
        #0 0x7fc3046e716b in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe716b)
        #1 0x7fc3045ee600 in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xb600)
        #2 0x7fc3045ef018 in __elf_getdata_rdlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xc018)
        #3 0x00000040642f in elf_sec_data /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3740

The problem here is that currently, libbpf only checks that the program
end is within the section bounds. There used to be a check
`while (sec_off < sec_sz)` in bpf_object__add_programs, however, it was
removed by commit 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program
sections to support overriden weak functions").

Put the above condition back to bpf_object__init_prog to make sure that
the program start is also within the bounds of the section to avoid the
potential buffer overflow.

[1] https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md

Reported-by: lmarch2 <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions")
Link: https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md
Link: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29481
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2025
…cesses

Acquire a lock on kvm->srcu when userspace is getting MP state to handle a
rather extreme edge case where "accepting" APIC events, i.e. processing
pending INIT or SIPI, can trigger accesses to guest memory.  If the vCPU
is in L2 with INIT *and* a TRIPLE_FAULT request pending, then getting MP
state will trigger a nested VM-Exit by way of ->check_nested_events(), and
emuating the nested VM-Exit can access guest memory.

The splat was originally hit by syzkaller on a Google-internal kernel, and
reproduced on an upstream kernel by hacking the triple_fault_event_test
selftest to stuff a pending INIT, store an MSR on VM-Exit (to generate a
memory access on VMX), and do vcpu_mp_state_get() to trigger the scenario.

  =============================
  WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
  6.14.0-rc3-b112d356288b-vmx/pi_lockdep_false_pos-lock #3 Not tainted
  -----------------------------
  include/linux/kvm_host.h:1058 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

  other info that might help us debug this:

  rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
  1 lock held by triple_fault_ev/1256:
   #0: ffff88810df5a330 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x8b/0x9a0 [kvm]

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 11 UID: 1000 PID: 1256 Comm: triple_fault_ev Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3-b112d356288b-vmx #3
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0x90
   lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x144/0x190
   kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot+0x156/0x180 [kvm]
   kvm_vcpu_read_guest+0x3e/0x90 [kvm]
   read_and_check_msr_entry+0x2e/0x180 [kvm_intel]
   __nested_vmx_vmexit+0x550/0xde0 [kvm_intel]
   kvm_check_nested_events+0x1b/0x30 [kvm]
   kvm_apic_accept_events+0x33/0x100 [kvm]
   kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate+0x30/0x1d0 [kvm]
   kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x33e/0x9a0 [kvm]
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8b/0xb0
   do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x170
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
   </TASK>

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
As shown in [1], it is possible to corrupt a BPF ELF file such that
arbitrary BPF instructions are loaded by libbpf. This can be done by
setting a symbol (BPF program) section offset to a large (unsigned)
number such that <section start + symbol offset> overflows and points
before the section data in the memory.

Consider the situation below where:
- prog_start = sec_start + symbol_offset    <-- size_t overflow here
- prog_end   = prog_start + prog_size

    prog_start        sec_start        prog_end        sec_end
        |                |                 |              |
        v                v                 v              v
    .....................|################################|............

The report in [1] also provides a corrupted BPF ELF which can be used as
a reproducer:

    $ readelf -S crash
    Section Headers:
      [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
           Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
      [ 2] uretprobe.mu[...] PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000040
           0000000000000068  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     8

    $ readelf -s crash
    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 8 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
    ...
         6: ffffffffffffffb8   104 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT    2 handle_tp

Here, the handle_tp prog has section offset ffffffffffffffb8, i.e. will
point before the actual memory where section 2 is allocated.

This is also reported by AddressSanitizer:

    =================================================================
    ==1232==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7c7302fe0000 at pc 0x7fc3046e4b77 bp 0x7ffe64677cd0 sp 0x7ffe64677490
    READ of size 104 at 0x7c7302fe0000 thread T0
        #0 0x7fc3046e4b76 in memcpy (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe4b76)
        #1 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__init_prog /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:856
        #2 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__add_programs /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:928
        #3 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__elf_collect /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3930
        #4 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object_open /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8067
        #5 0x00000040f176 in bpf_object__open_file /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8090
        #6 0x000000400c16 in main /poc/poc.c:8
        #7 0x7fc3043d25b4 in __libc_start_call_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x35b4)
        #8 0x7fc3043d2667 in __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3667)
        #9 0x000000400b34 in _start (/poc/poc+0x400b34)

    0x7c7302fe0000 is located 64 bytes before 104-byte region [0x7c7302fe0040,0x7c7302fe00a8)
    allocated by thread T0 here:
        #0 0x7fc3046e716b in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe716b)
        #1 0x7fc3045ee600 in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xb600)
        #2 0x7fc3045ef018 in __elf_getdata_rdlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xc018)
        #3 0x00000040642f in elf_sec_data /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3740

The problem here is that currently, libbpf only checks that the program
end is within the section bounds. There used to be a check
`while (sec_off < sec_sz)` in bpf_object__add_programs, however, it was
removed by commit 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program
sections to support overriden weak functions").

Add a check for detecting the overflow of `sec_off + prog_sz` to
bpf_object__init_prog to fix this issue.

[1] https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md

Reported-by: lmarch2 <[email protected]>
Link: https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md
Fixes: 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions")
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
As shown in [1], it is possible to corrupt a BPF ELF file such that
arbitrary BPF instructions are loaded by libbpf. This can be done by
setting a symbol (BPF program) section offset to a large (unsigned)
number such that <section start + symbol offset> overflows and points
before the section data in the memory.

Consider the situation below where:
- prog_start = sec_start + symbol_offset    <-- size_t overflow here
- prog_end   = prog_start + prog_size

    prog_start        sec_start        prog_end        sec_end
        |                |                 |              |
        v                v                 v              v
    .....................|################################|............

The report in [1] also provides a corrupted BPF ELF which can be used as
a reproducer:

    $ readelf -S crash
    Section Headers:
      [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
           Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
      [ 2] uretprobe.mu[...] PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000040
           0000000000000068  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     8

    $ readelf -s crash
    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 8 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
    ...
         6: ffffffffffffffb8   104 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT    2 handle_tp

Here, the handle_tp prog has section offset ffffffffffffffb8, i.e. will
point before the actual memory where section 2 is allocated.

This is also reported by AddressSanitizer:

    =================================================================
    ==1232==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7c7302fe0000 at pc 0x7fc3046e4b77 bp 0x7ffe64677cd0 sp 0x7ffe64677490
    READ of size 104 at 0x7c7302fe0000 thread T0
        #0 0x7fc3046e4b76 in memcpy (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe4b76)
        #1 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__init_prog /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:856
        #2 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__add_programs /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:928
        #3 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__elf_collect /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3930
        #4 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object_open /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8067
        #5 0x00000040f176 in bpf_object__open_file /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8090
        #6 0x000000400c16 in main /poc/poc.c:8
        #7 0x7fc3043d25b4 in __libc_start_call_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x35b4)
        #8 0x7fc3043d2667 in __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3667)
        #9 0x000000400b34 in _start (/poc/poc+0x400b34)

    0x7c7302fe0000 is located 64 bytes before 104-byte region [0x7c7302fe0040,0x7c7302fe00a8)
    allocated by thread T0 here:
        #0 0x7fc3046e716b in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe716b)
        #1 0x7fc3045ee600 in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xb600)
        #2 0x7fc3045ef018 in __elf_getdata_rdlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xc018)
        #3 0x00000040642f in elf_sec_data /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3740

The problem here is that currently, libbpf only checks that the program
end is within the section bounds. There used to be a check
`while (sec_off < sec_sz)` in bpf_object__add_programs, however, it was
removed by commit 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program
sections to support overriden weak functions").

Add a check for detecting the overflow of `sec_off + prog_sz` to
bpf_object__init_prog to fix this issue.

[1] https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md

Reported-by: lmarch2 <[email protected]>
Link: https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md
Fixes: 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions")
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
As shown in [1], it is possible to corrupt a BPF ELF file such that
arbitrary BPF instructions are loaded by libbpf. This can be done by
setting a symbol (BPF program) section offset to a large (unsigned)
number such that <section start + symbol offset> overflows and points
before the section data in the memory.

Consider the situation below where:
- prog_start = sec_start + symbol_offset    <-- size_t overflow here
- prog_end   = prog_start + prog_size

    prog_start        sec_start        prog_end        sec_end
        |                |                 |              |
        v                v                 v              v
    .....................|################################|............

The report in [1] also provides a corrupted BPF ELF which can be used as
a reproducer:

    $ readelf -S crash
    Section Headers:
      [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
           Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
      [ 2] uretprobe.mu[...] PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000040
           0000000000000068  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     8

    $ readelf -s crash
    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 8 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
    ...
         6: ffffffffffffffb8   104 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT    2 handle_tp

Here, the handle_tp prog has section offset ffffffffffffffb8, i.e. will
point before the actual memory where section 2 is allocated.

This is also reported by AddressSanitizer:

    =================================================================
    ==1232==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7c7302fe0000 at pc 0x7fc3046e4b77 bp 0x7ffe64677cd0 sp 0x7ffe64677490
    READ of size 104 at 0x7c7302fe0000 thread T0
        #0 0x7fc3046e4b76 in memcpy (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe4b76)
        #1 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__init_prog /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:856
        #2 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__add_programs /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:928
        #3 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__elf_collect /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3930
        #4 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object_open /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8067
        #5 0x00000040f176 in bpf_object__open_file /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8090
        #6 0x000000400c16 in main /poc/poc.c:8
        #7 0x7fc3043d25b4 in __libc_start_call_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x35b4)
        #8 0x7fc3043d2667 in __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3667)
        #9 0x000000400b34 in _start (/poc/poc+0x400b34)

    0x7c7302fe0000 is located 64 bytes before 104-byte region [0x7c7302fe0040,0x7c7302fe00a8)
    allocated by thread T0 here:
        #0 0x7fc3046e716b in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe716b)
        #1 0x7fc3045ee600 in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xb600)
        #2 0x7fc3045ef018 in __elf_getdata_rdlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xc018)
        #3 0x00000040642f in elf_sec_data /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3740

The problem here is that currently, libbpf only checks that the program
end is within the section bounds. There used to be a check
`while (sec_off < sec_sz)` in bpf_object__add_programs, however, it was
removed by commit 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program
sections to support overriden weak functions").

Add a check for detecting the overflow of `sec_off + prog_sz` to
bpf_object__init_prog to fix this issue.

[1] https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md

Reported-by: lmarch2 <[email protected]>
Link: https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md
Fixes: 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions")
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
As shown in [1], it is possible to corrupt a BPF ELF file such that
arbitrary BPF instructions are loaded by libbpf. This can be done by
setting a symbol (BPF program) section offset to a large (unsigned)
number such that <section start + symbol offset> overflows and points
before the section data in the memory.

Consider the situation below where:
- prog_start = sec_start + symbol_offset    <-- size_t overflow here
- prog_end   = prog_start + prog_size

    prog_start        sec_start        prog_end        sec_end
        |                |                 |              |
        v                v                 v              v
    .....................|################################|............

The report in [1] also provides a corrupted BPF ELF which can be used as
a reproducer:

    $ readelf -S crash
    Section Headers:
      [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
           Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
      [ 2] uretprobe.mu[...] PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000040
           0000000000000068  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     8

    $ readelf -s crash
    Symbol table '.symtab' contains 8 entries:
       Num:    Value          Size Type    Bind   Vis      Ndx Name
    ...
         6: ffffffffffffffb8   104 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT    2 handle_tp

Here, the handle_tp prog has section offset ffffffffffffffb8, i.e. will
point before the actual memory where section 2 is allocated.

This is also reported by AddressSanitizer:

    =================================================================
    ==1232==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7c7302fe0000 at pc 0x7fc3046e4b77 bp 0x7ffe64677cd0 sp 0x7ffe64677490
    READ of size 104 at 0x7c7302fe0000 thread T0
        #0 0x7fc3046e4b76 in memcpy (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe4b76)
        #1 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__init_prog /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:856
        #2 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__add_programs /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:928
        #3 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__elf_collect /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3930
        #4 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object_open /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8067
        #5 0x00000040f176 in bpf_object__open_file /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8090
        #6 0x000000400c16 in main /poc/poc.c:8
        #7 0x7fc3043d25b4 in __libc_start_call_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x35b4)
        #8 0x7fc3043d2667 in __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3667)
        #9 0x000000400b34 in _start (/poc/poc+0x400b34)

    0x7c7302fe0000 is located 64 bytes before 104-byte region [0x7c7302fe0040,0x7c7302fe00a8)
    allocated by thread T0 here:
        #0 0x7fc3046e716b in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe716b)
        #1 0x7fc3045ee600 in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xb600)
        #2 0x7fc3045ef018 in __elf_getdata_rdlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xc018)
        #3 0x00000040642f in elf_sec_data /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3740

The problem here is that currently, libbpf only checks that the program
end is within the section bounds. There used to be a check
`while (sec_off < sec_sz)` in bpf_object__add_programs, however, it was
removed by commit 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program
sections to support overriden weak functions").

Add a check for detecting the overflow of `sec_off + prog_sz` to
bpf_object__init_prog to fix this issue.

[1] https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md

Fixes: 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions")
Reported-by: lmarch2 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Link: https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 #252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 #252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]>
CC: <[email protected]> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2025
Commit 03df156 ("xdp: double protect netdev->xdp_flags with
netdev->lock") introduces the netdev lock to xdp_set_features_flag().
The change includes a _locked version of the method, as it is possible
for a driver to have already acquired the netdev lock before calling
this helper. However, the same applies to
xdp_features_(set|clear)_redirect_flags(), which ends up calling the
unlocked version of xdp_set_features_flags() leading to deadlocks in
GVE, which grabs the netdev lock as part of its suspend, reset, and
shutdown processes:

[  833.265543] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[  833.270949] 6.15.0-rc1 #6 Tainted: G            E
[  833.276271] --------------------------------------------
[  833.281681] systemd-shutdow/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[  833.287090] ffff949d2b148c68 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xdp_set_features_flag+0x29/0x90
[  833.295470]
[  833.295470] but task is already holding lock:
[  833.301400] ffff949d2b148c68 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: gve_shutdown+0x44/0x90 [gve]
[  833.309508]
[  833.309508] other info that might help us debug this:
[  833.316130]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  833.316130]
[  833.322142]        CPU0
[  833.324681]        ----
[  833.327220]   lock(&dev->lock);
[  833.330455]   lock(&dev->lock);
[  833.333689]
[  833.333689]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  833.333689]
[  833.339701]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[  833.339701]
[  833.346582] 5 locks held by systemd-shutdow/1:
[  833.351205]  #0: ffffffffa9c89130 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __se_sys_reboot+0xe6/0x210
[  833.360695]  #1: ffff93b399e5c1b8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_shutdown+0xb4/0x1f0
[  833.369144]  #2: ffff949d19a471b8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_shutdown+0xc2/0x1f0
[  833.377603]  #3: ffffffffa9eca050 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: gve_shutdown+0x33/0x90 [gve]
[  833.386138]  #4: ffff949d2b148c68 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: gve_shutdown+0x44/0x90 [gve]

Introduce xdp_features_(set|clear)_redirect_target_locked() versions
which assume that the netdev lock has already been acquired before
setting the XDP feature flag and update GVE to use the locked version.

Fixes: 03df156 ("xdp: double protect netdev->xdp_flags with netdev->lock")
Tested-by: Mina Almasry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Harshitha Ramamurthy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Washington <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2025
Running a modified trace-cmd record --nosplice where it does a mmap of the
ring buffer when '--nosplice' is set, caused the following lockdep splat:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f #551 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 trace-cmd/1113 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100062888 (&buffer->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff888100a5f9f8 (&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #5 (&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70
        tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0
        __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70
        do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010
        vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390
        ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -> #4 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
        __might_fault+0xa5/0x110
        _copy_to_user+0x22/0x80
        _perf_ioctl+0x61b/0x1b70
        perf_ioctl+0x62/0x90
        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x190
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -> #3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        perf_event_init_cpu+0x325/0x7c0
        perf_event_init+0x52a/0x5b0
        start_kernel+0x263/0x3e0
        x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30
        x86_64_start_kernel+0x95/0xa0
        common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141

 -> #2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        perf_event_init_cpu+0xb7/0x7c0
        cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x2c0/0x1030
        __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0xbf/0x1f0
        _cpu_up+0x2e7/0x690
        cpu_up+0x117/0x170
        cpuhp_bringup_mask+0xd5/0x120
        bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x13d/0x170
        smp_init+0x2b/0xf0
        kernel_init_freeable+0x441/0x6d0
        kernel_init+0x1e/0x160
        ret_from_fork+0x34/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
        cpus_read_lock+0x2a/0xd0
        ring_buffer_resize+0x610/0x14e0
        __tracing_resize_ring_buffer.part.0+0x42/0x120
        tracing_set_tracer+0x7bd/0xa80
        tracing_set_trace_write+0x132/0x1e0
        vfs_write+0x21c/0xe80
        ksys_write+0xf9/0x1c0
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -> #0 (&buffer->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210
        lock_acquire+0x174/0x310
        __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
        ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
        tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0
        __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70
        do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010
        vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390
        ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440
        do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   &buffer->mutex --> &mm->mmap_lock --> &cpu_buffer->mapping_lock

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
                                lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
                                lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
   lock(&buffer->mutex);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 2 locks held by trace-cmd/1113:
  #0: ffff888106b847e0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x192/0x390
  #1: ffff888100a5f9f8 (&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1113 Comm: trace-cmd Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f #551 PREEMPT
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x178/0x1be
  check_noncircular+0x146/0x160
  __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210
  lock_acquire+0x174/0x310
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? __mutex_lock+0x169/0x18c0
  __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? function_trace_call+0x296/0x370
  ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_function_trace_call+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? __mutex_lock+0x5/0x18c0
  ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70
  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12d/0x270
  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50
  ? rcu_is_watching+0x15/0xb0
  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50
  ? trace_preempt_on+0xd0/0x110
  tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0
  __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70
  ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0
  ? __pfx___mmap_region+0x10/0x10
  ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0
  ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10
  ? bpf_lsm_mmap_addr+0x4/0x10
  ? security_mmap_addr+0x46/0xd0
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd9/0x130
  do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010
  ? 0xffffffffc0370095
  ? __pfx_do_mmap+0x10/0x10
  vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390
  ? __pfx_vm_mmap_pgoff+0x10/0x10
  ? 0xffffffffc0370095
  ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440
  do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7fb0963a7de2
 Code: 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 f7 c1 ff 0f 00 00 75 27 55 89 cd 53 48 89 fb 48 85 ff 74 3b 41 89 ea 48 89 df b8 09 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 76 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 00 48 8b 05 e1 9f 0d 00 64
 RSP: 002b:00007ffdcc8fb878 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000009
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb0963a7de2
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: 0000000000000000
 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000006 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffdcc8fbe68 R14: 00007fb096628000 R15: 00005633e01a5c90
  </TASK>

The issue is that cpus_read_lock() is taken within buffer->mutex. The
memory mapped pages are taken with the mmap_lock held. The buffer->mutex
is taken within the cpu_buffer->mapping_lock. There's quite a chain with
all these locks, where the deadlock can be fixed by moving the
cpus_read_lock() outside the taking of the buffer->mutex.

Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Fixes: 117c392 ("ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
Despite the fact that several lockdep-related checks are skipped when
calling trylock* versions of the locking primitives, for example
mutex_trylock, each time the mutex is acquired, a held_lock is still
placed onto the lockdep stack by __lock_acquire() which is called
regardless of whether the trylock* or regular locking API was used.

This means that if the caller successfully acquires more than
MAX_LOCK_DEPTH locks of the same class, even when using mutex_trylock,
lockdep will still complain that the maximum depth of the held lock stack
has been reached and disable itself.

For example, the following error currently occurs in the ARM version
of KVM, once the code tries to lock all vCPUs of a VM configured with more
than MAX_LOCK_DEPTH vCPUs, a situation that can easily happen on modern
systems, where having more than 48 CPUs is common, and it's also common to
run VMs that have vCPU counts approaching that number:

[  328.171264] BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
[  328.175227] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[  328.180726] Please attach the output of /proc/lock_stat to the bug report
[  328.187531] depth: 48  max: 48!
[  328.190678] 48 locks held by qemu-kvm/11664:
[  328.194957]  #0: ffff800086de5ba0 (&kvm->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_ioctl_create_device+0x174/0x5b0
[  328.204048]  #1: ffff0800e78800b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.212521]  #2: ffff07ffeee51e98 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.220991]  #3: ffff0800dc7d80b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.229463]  #4: ffff07ffe0c980b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.237934]  #5: ffff0800a3883c78 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.246405]  #6: ffff07fffbe480b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0

Luckily, in all instances that require locking all vCPUs, the
'kvm->lock' is taken a priori, and that fact makes it possible to use
the little known feature of lockdep, called a 'nest_lock', to avoid this
warning and subsequent lockdep self-disablement.

The action of 'nested lock' being provided to lockdep's lock_acquire(),
causes the lockdep to detect that the top of the held lock stack contains
a lock of the same class and then increment its reference counter instead
of pushing a new held_lock item onto that stack.

See __lock_acquire for more information.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
Use kvm_trylock_all_vcpus instead of a custom implementation when locking
all vCPUs of a VM, to avoid triggering a lockdep warning, in the case in
which the VM is configured to have more than MAX_LOCK_DEPTH vCPUs.

This fixes the following false lockdep warning:

[  328.171264] BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
[  328.175227] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[  328.180726] Please attach the output of /proc/lock_stat to the bug report
[  328.187531] depth: 48  max: 48!
[  328.190678] 48 locks held by qemu-kvm/11664:
[  328.194957]  #0: ffff800086de5ba0 (&kvm->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_ioctl_create_device+0x174/0x5b0
[  328.204048]  #1: ffff0800e78800b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.212521]  #2: ffff07ffeee51e98 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.220991]  #3: ffff0800dc7d80b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.229463]  #4: ffff07ffe0c980b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.237934]  #5: ffff0800a3883c78 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0
[  328.246405]  #6: ffff07fffbe480b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0

Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
This patch enables support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS on RISC-V.
This allows each ftrace callsite to provide an ftrace_ops to the common
ftrace trampoline, allowing each callsite to invoke distinct tracer
functions without the need to fall back to list processing or to
allocate custom trampolines for each callsite. This significantly speeds
up cases where multiple distinct trace functions are used and callsites
are mostly traced by a single tracer.

The idea and most of the implementation is taken from the ARM64's
implementation of the same feature. The idea is to place a pointer to
the ftrace_ops as a literal at a fixed offset from the function entry
point, which can be recovered by the common ftrace trampoline.

We use -fpatchable-function-entry to reserve 8 bytes above the function
entry by emitting 2 4 byte or 4 2 byte  nops depending on the presence of
CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C. These 8 bytes are patched at runtime with a pointer
to the associated ftrace_ops for that callsite. Functions are aligned to
8 bytes to make sure that the accesses to this literal are atomic.

This approach allows for directly invoking ftrace_ops::func even for
ftrace_ops which are dynamically-allocated (or part of a module),
without going via ftrace_ops_list_func.

We've benchamrked this with the ftrace_ops sample module on Spacemit K1
Jupiter:

Without this patch:

baseline (Linux rivos 6.14.0-09584-g7d06015d936c #3 SMP Sat Mar 29
+-----------------------+-----------------+----------------------------+
|  Number of tracers    | Total time (ns) | Per-call average time      |
|-----------------------+-----------------+----------------------------|
| Relevant | Irrelevant |    100000 calls | Total (ns) | Overhead (ns) |
|----------+------------+-----------------+------------+---------------|
|        0 |          0 |        1357958 |          13 |             - |
|        0 |          1 |        1302375 |          13 |             - |
|        0 |          2 |        1302375 |          13 |             - |
|        0 |         10 |        1379084 |          13 |             - |
|        0 |        100 |        1302458 |          13 |             - |
|        0 |        200 |        1302333 |          13 |             - |
|----------+------------+-----------------+------------+---------------|
|        1 |          0 |       13677833 |         136 |           123 |
|        1 |          1 |       18500916 |         185 |           172 |
|        1 |          2 |       22856459 |         228 |           215 |
|        1 |         10 |       58824709 |         588 |           575 |
|        1 |        100 |      505141584 |        5051 |          5038 |
|        1 |        200 |     1580473126 |       15804 |         15791 |
|----------+------------+-----------------+------------+---------------|
|        1 |          0 |       13561000 |         135 |           122 |
|        2 |          0 |       19707292 |         197 |           184 |
|       10 |          0 |       67774750 |         677 |           664 |
|      100 |          0 |      714123125 |        7141 |          7128 |
|      200 |          0 |     1918065668 |       19180 |         19167 |
+----------+------------+-----------------+------------+---------------+

Note: per-call overhead is estimated relative to the baseline case with
0 relevant tracers and 0 irrelevant tracers.

With this patch:

v4-rc4 (Linux rivos 6.14.0-09598-gd75747611c93 #4 SMP Sat Mar 29
+-----------------------+-----------------+----------------------------+
|  Number of tracers    | Total time (ns) | Per-call average time      |
|-----------------------+-----------------+----------------------------|
| Relevant | Irrelevant |    100000 calls | Total (ns) | Overhead (ns) |
|----------+------------+-----------------+------------+---------------|
|        0 |          0 |         1459917 |         14 |             - |
|        0 |          1 |         1408000 |         14 |             - |
|        0 |          2 |         1383792 |         13 |             - |
|        0 |         10 |         1430709 |         14 |             - |
|        0 |        100 |         1383791 |         13 |             - |
|        0 |        200 |         1383750 |         13 |             - |
|----------+------------+-----------------+------------+---------------|
|        1 |          0 |         5238041 |         52 |            38 |
|        1 |          1 |         5228542 |         52 |            38 |
|        1 |          2 |         5325917 |         53 |            40 |
|        1 |         10 |         5299667 |         52 |            38 |
|        1 |        100 |         5245250 |         52 |            39 |
|        1 |        200 |         5238459 |         52 |            39 |
|----------+------------+-----------------+------------+---------------|
|        1 |          0 |         5239083 |         52 |            38 |
|        2 |          0 |        19449417 |        194 |           181 |
|       10 |          0 |        67718584 |        677 |           663 |
|      100 |          0 |       709840708 |       7098 |          7085 |
|      200 |          0 |      2203580626 |      22035 |         22022 |
+----------+------------+-----------------+------------+---------------+

Note: per-call overhead is estimated relative to the baseline case with
0 relevant tracers and 0 irrelevant tracers.

As can be seen from the above:

 a) Whenever there is a single relevant tracer function associated with a
    tracee, the overhead of invoking the tracer is constant, and does not
    scale with the number of tracers which are *not* associated with that
    tracee.

 b) The overhead for a single relevant tracer has dropped to ~1/3 of the
    overhead prior to this series (from 122ns to 38ns). This is largely
    due to permitting calls to dynamically-allocated ftrace_ops without
    going through ftrace_ops_list_func.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>

[update kconfig, asm, refactor]

Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant