-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[SandboxIR] Added new StoreInst::create() functions with isVolatile arg #100961
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SandboxIR] Added new StoreInst::create() functions with isVolatile arg #100961
Conversation
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
@vporpo after the bots pass, is it okay for you to merge this or Is there more changes need to be made? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few minor changes. Looks good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks for the patch. I will merge it as soon as the bots pass.
Adding |
I noticed I can't directly request reviewers for SandboxIR contributions. Would it be alright if I continue mentioning you and other relevant reviewers for my patches? |
Hmm what do you mean? Doesn't clicking on "Reviewers" and adding my or other people's name work? |
It doesn't seems as if I can. I don't think I have the permissions for that. |
Don't worry about it, just mention me and I will review the patch. |
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/2283 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference:
|
@vporpo Just to be clear, so I'm implementing the setVerbose() method for the StoreInst or is it something completely separate? |
Yes, both llvm::LoadInst and llvm::StoreInst have a |
@medievalghoul sorry I misspelled: I meant |
No worries, thanks for letting me know. |
Closed PR: #100957
As stated this patch just implements the volatile-memory data for StoreInst